This essential reference for graduate students and researchers provides a unified treatment of earthquakes and faulting as two aspects of brittle tectonics at different timescales. The intimate connection between the two is manifested in their scaling laws and populations, which evolve from fracture growth and interactions between fractures. The connection between faults and the seismicity generated is governed by the rate and state dependent friction laws - producing distinctive seismic styles of faulting and a gamut of earthquake phenomena including aftershocks, afterslip, earthquake triggering, and slow slip events. The third edition of this classic treatise presents a wealth of new topics and new observations. These include slow earthquake phenomena; friction of phyllosilicates, and at high sliding velocities; fault structures; relative roles of strong and seismogenic versus weak and creeping faults; dynamic triggering of earthquakes; oceanic earthquakes; megathrust earthquakes in subduction zones; deep earthquakes; and new observations of earthquake precursory phenomena.

The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

/pdf/phanerozoic-polar-wander-palaeogeography-and-dynamics-3fc5flnbf0.pdf

Phanerozoic polar wander, palaeogeography and dynamics

The new tectonic map of the Alps is based on the combination of purely structural data with criteria regarding paleogeographical affiliation and/or tectono-metamorphic evolution. The orogenic evolution of the Alps is discussed using a combination of maps and paleogeographical reconstructions. It is proposed that the Alps are the product of two orogenies, a Cretaceous followed by a Tertiary one. While the former is related to the closure of an embayment of the Meliata ocean into Apulia, the latter is due to the closure of the Alpine Tethys between Apulia and Europe. The along-strike changes in the overall architecture, as for example revealed by geophysical-geological transects, are by far more substantial than hitherto believed. It appears that the Alps are still far from being over-investigated, as is demonstrated by many surprising recent findings based on field geology, laboratory results and geophysical methods of deep sounding.

/pdf/tectonic-map-and-overall-architecture-of-the-alpine-orogen-23efh3jp0j.pdf

Tectonic map and overall architecture of the Alpine orogen

SUMMARY Plate motions relative to the hotspots over the past 4 to 7 Myr are investigated with a goal of determining the shortest time interval over which reliable volcanic propagation rates and segment trends can be estimated. The rate and trend uncertainties are objectively determined from the dispersion of volcano age and of volcano location and are used to test the mutual consistency of the trends and rates. Ten hotspot data sets are constructed from overlapping time intervals with various durations and starting times. Our preferred hotspot data set, HS3, consists of two volcanic propagation rates and eleven segment trends from four plates. It averages plate motion over the past ≈5.8 Myr, which is almost twice the length of time (3.2 Myr) over which the NUVEL-1A global set of relative plate angular velocities is estimated. HS3-NUVEL1A, our preferred set of angular velocities of 15 plates relative to the hotspots, was constructed from the HS3 data set while constraining the relative plate angular velocities to consistency with NUVEL-1A. No hotspots are in significant relative motion, but the 95 per cent confidence limit on motion is typically ±20 to ±40 km Myr −1 and ranges up to ±145 km Myr −1 . The uncertainties of the new angular velocities of plates relative to the hotspots are smaller than those of previously published HS2-NUVEL1 (Gripp & Gordon 1990), while being averaged over a shorter and much more uniform time interval. Nine of the fourteen HS2-NUVEL1 angular velocities lie outside the 95 per cent confidence region of the corresponding HS3NUVEL1A angular velocity, while all fourteen of the HS3-NUVEL1A angular velocities lie inside the 95 per cent confidence region of the corresponding HS2-NUVEL1 angular velocity. The HS2-NUVEL1 Pacific Plate angular velocity lies inside the 95 per cent confidence region of the HS3-NUVEL1A Pacific Plate angular velocity, but the 0 to 3 Ma Pacific Plate angular velocity of Wessel & Kroenke (1997) lies far outside the confidence region. We show that the change in trend of the Hawaiian hotspot over the past 2 to 3 Myr has no counterpart on other chains and therefore provides no basis for inferring a change in Pacific Plate motion relative to global hotspots. The current angular velocity of the Pacific Plate can be shown to differ from the average over the past 47 Myr in rate but not in orientation, with the current rotation being about 50 per cent faster (1.06 ± 0.10 deg Myr −1 ) than the average (0.70 deg Myr −1 ) since the 47-Myr-old bend in the Hawaiian‐Emperor chain.

/pdf/young-tracks-of-hotspots-and-current-plate-velocities-4qm8vsz8fm.pdf

Young tracks of hotspots and current plate velocities

[1] The western Mediterranean subduction zone (WMSZ) extends from the northern Apennine to southern Spain and turns around forming the narrow and tight Calabrian and Gibraltar Arcs. The evolution of the WMSZ is characterized by a first phase of orogenic wedging followed, from 30 Ma on, by trench retreat and back-arc extension. Combining new and previous geological data, new tomographic images of the western Mediterranean mantle, and plate kinematics, we describe the evolution of the WMSZ during the last 35 Myr. Our reconstruction shows that the two arcs form by fragmentation of the 1500 km long WMSZ in small, narrow slabs. Once formed, these two narrow slabs retreat outward, producing back-arc extension and large scale rotation of the flanks, shaping the arcs. The Gibraltar Arc first formed during the middle Miocene, while the Calabrian Arc formed later, during the late Miocene-Pliocene. Despite the different paleogeographic settings, the mechanism of rupture and backward migration of the narrow slabs presents similarities on both sides of the western Mediterranean, suggesting that the slab deformation is also driven by lateral mantle flow that is particularly efficient in a restricted (upper mantle) style of mantle convection.

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2002TC001488

Lateral slab deformation and the origin of the western Mediterranean arcs

In W-dipping subduction zones there is a general eastward progression of the back-arc basin-accretionary wedge-foredeep complex. With the forward progression, early stages of the complex are revealed by slices of upper crust and sedimentary cover abandoned to the west left floating above a new section of mantle. A major shear zone should form at the new Moho separating upper crust slices of earlier accretionary stages and the eastward flowing mantle. The mantle wedging at the top of the subduction plane could be responsible for the uplift of the central parts of the belt. The retreating of the subduction hinge is interpreted as due to the push generated by the ‘eastward mantle flow detected in the hot spot reference frame. The foredeep depth is mainly a function of the radius of curvature of the subduction hinge. The frontal wedge is constructed from the stacking of the upper layers of the subducting plate and the syntectonic clastics that fill the foredeep which are progressively involved in thrusting and later by extension. In order to preserve volume balance, the lithosphere of the eastern plate before subduction has to be the same size as that which has been subducted: due to the longer length of the arc with respect to the original length of the linear margin between the two converging plates, laterally stretched subducted lithosphere is predicted at depth. W-dipping subductions usually have a short life probably due to their inherent capability to produce new lateral heterogeneities of the lithosphere (the thin back-arc) which are a key factor in controlling and generating new subductions (both E- and W-dipping). This model is applied to the Apennines-Tyrrhenian Sea system.

A proposal for the kinematic modelling of W-dipping subductions - possible applications to the Tyrrhenian-Apennines system

On the post-25 Ma geodynamic evolution of the western Mediterranean

The Apenninic foreland shows two distinct structural signatures comparing the central Adriatic Sea and the Puglia region. During the Pliocene-Pleistocene the central Adriatic underwent high subsidence rates due to the eastward rollback of the hinge of the west dipping Apenninic subduction. The Puglia region and the Bradanic foredeep are located southward along strike in the same foreland, but, in contrast with the central Adriatic, after Pliocene-early Pleistocene subsidence they underwent uplift since the middle Pleistocene. The geometry and the kinematics of the frontal accretionary wedge and related foreland changed from that moment on between the two areas. At the front of the central northern Apennines, off scraping and subsidence continued, whereas the foredeep and foreland of the southern Apennines were buckled. Those differences are interpreted as being due to the larger subduction hinge rollback rate since middle Pleistocene of the central Adriatic lithosphere (70 km thick) with respect to the thicker Puglia (110 km). The different thicknesses of the continental crust and lithosphere were inherited from the Mesozoic rifting that disrupted the Adriatic plate. The different thicknesses appear to have controlled the variable degree of flexure of the lithosphere and its asthenospheric penetration rate. The Tremiti E–W alignment is the right-lateral lithospheric transfer zone of those different tectonic regimes. The consequent different dip of the subduction in the two sections (steeper west of Puglia) could also explain the lower elevation of the southern Apennines, compared to their central-northern sector.

Carlo Doglioni

Papers

A proposal for the kinematic modelling of W-dipping subductions - possible applications to the Tyrrhenian-Apennines system

On the post-25 Ma geodynamic evolution of the western Mediterranean

The Puglia uplift (SE Italy): An anomaly in the foreland of the Apenninic subduction due to buckling of a thick continental lithosphere

Geodynamic evolution of the central and western Mediterranean: Tectonics vs. igneous petrology constraints

Orogens and slabs vs. their direction of subduction