C
Carlos David Navarrete
Researcher at Michigan State University
Publications - 40
Citations - 2966
Carlos David Navarrete is an academic researcher from Michigan State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: In-group favoritism & Evolutionary psychology. The author has an hindex of 24, co-authored 39 publications receiving 2615 citations. Previous affiliations of Carlos David Navarrete include University of California, Los Angeles & University of California.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Disease avoidance and ethnocentrism: the effects of disease vulnerability and disgust sensitivity on intergroup attitudes
TL;DR: Faulkner et al. as mentioned in this paper explored the relationship between disease threat and intergroup attitudes and found that ethnocentric attitudes increase as a function of perceived disease vulnerability and disgust sensitivity.
Journal ArticleDOI
Evolution and the psychology of intergroup conflict: the male warrior hypothesis.
TL;DR: How male coalitional aggression could have affected the social psychologies of men and women differently is described and preliminary evidence from experimental social psychological studies testing various predictions from the ‘male warrior’ hypothesis is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI
Prejudice at the Nexus of Race and Gender: An Outgroup Male Target Hypothesis
TL;DR: Results are reported showing that race bias is moderated by gender differences in traits relevant to threat responses that differ in their adaptive utility between the sexes, consistent with the notion that the psychology of intergroup bias is generated by different psychological systems for men and women.
Journal ArticleDOI
Elevated ethnocentrism in the first trimester of pregnancy
TL;DR: The authors explored the expression of intergroup attitudes in a sample of pregnant women from the United States and found that favoritism toward the ingroup peaks during the first trimester of pregnancy and decreases during the second and third trimesters.
Journal ArticleDOI
Meat Is Good to Taboo: Dietary Proscriptions as a Product of the Interaction of Psychological Mechanisms and Social Processes
TL;DR: In this article, the authors adopt an evolutionary approach to the mind and identify three psychosocial processes, socially mediated ingestive conditioning, egocentric empathy, and normative moralization, each of which likely plays a role in transforming individual disgust responses and conditioned food aversions into institutionalized food taboos.