C
Casey Marnie
Researcher at University of South Australia
Publications - 16
Citations - 1682
Casey Marnie is an academic researcher from University of South Australia. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Staffing. The author has an hindex of 3, co-authored 8 publications receiving 159 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
Micah D J Peters,Micah D J Peters,Micah D J Peters,Casey Marnie,Andrea C. Tricco,Andrea C. Tricco,Andrea C. Tricco,Danielle Pollock,Zachary Munn,Lyndsay Alexander,Patricia McInerney,Christina Godfrey,Hanan Khalil +12 more
TL;DR: The updated JBI guidance for scoping reviews includes additional guidance on several methodological issues, such as when a scoping review is (or is not) appropriate, and how to extract, analyze, and present results, and provides clarification for implications for practice and research.
Journal ArticleDOI
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
Micah D J Peters,Casey Marnie,Andrea C. Tricco,Danielle Pollock,Zachary Munn,Lyndsay Alexander,Patricia McInerney,Christina Godfrey,Hanan Khalil +8 more
TL;DR: The JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group developed guidance for conducting a JBI scoping review, with a focus on new updates to the approach and development of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (the PRISMA-ScR) as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application.
Micah D J Peters,Micah D J Peters,Casey Marnie,Heather Colquhoun,Chantelle Garritty,Susanne Hempel,Tanya Horsley,Etienne V. Langlois,Erin Lillie,Kelly K O'Brien,Ӧzge Tunçalp,Michael G. Wilson,Wasifa Zarin,Andrea C. Tricco,Andrea C. Tricco,Andrea C. Tricco +15 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a concise source of information regarding the difference between scoping reviews and other review types, the reasons for undertaking scoping review, and an update on methodological guidance for the conduct and reporting of scope reviews.
Journal ArticleDOI
Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols
Micah D J Peters,Christina Godfrey,Patricia McInerney,Hanan Khalil,Palle Larsen,Casey Marnie,Danielle Pollock,Andrea C. Tricco,Zachary Munn +8 more
TL;DR: Detailed guidance and a checklist for prospective authors to ensure that their protocols adequately inform both the conduct of the ensuing review and their readership is provided.
Journal ArticleDOI
Policies and procedures for personal protective equipment: Does inconsistency increase risk of contamination and infection?
TL;DR: A lack of consistency regarding PPE policy and recommendations has been discussed by Chughtai et al. as discussed by the authors, focusing more specifically on recommended processes for the use of PPE, particularly donning and doffing practices, leading to confusion, concern, avoidable errors, and most seriously, increased risk of contamination and infection for both health and aged care staff, as well as patients and community members.