C
Casper Harteveld
Researcher at Northeastern University
Publications - 105
Citations - 1482
Casper Harteveld is an academic researcher from Northeastern University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Game design & Computer science. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 84 publications receiving 1089 citations. Previous affiliations of Casper Harteveld include Delft University of Technology & University of Houston–Clear Lake.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The research and evaluation of serious games: Toward a comprehensive methodology
Igor Mayer,Geertje Bekebrede,Casper Harteveld,Harald Warmelink,Qiqi Zhou,Theo van Ruijven,Julia C. Lo,Rens Kortmann,Ivo Wenzler +8 more
TL;DR: The authors present the methodology and dataset, which form a sound foundation for forthcoming publications on the empirical results, which comprises data on 2488 respondents in higher education or work organizations.
Book
Triadic Game Design: Balancing Reality, Meaning and Play
TL;DR: The fundamentals of designing any game with a serious purpose are examined and a way of thinking on how to design one successfully is provided and a design philosophy called Triadic Game Design is introduced.
Journal ArticleDOI
Balancing Play, Meaning and Reality: The Design Philosophy of LEVEE PATROLLER
TL;DR: The underlying design philosophy of LEVEE PATROLLER, a game to train levee patrollers in the Netherlands, stipulates that the design of a digital serious game is a multiobjective problem in which trade-offs need to be made.
Book
Triadic Game Design
TL;DR: The Triadic Game Design (TGD) as discussed by the authors is a design philosophy that all games involve three worlds: the worlds of Reality, Meaning, and Play, each world is affiliated with aspects.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
On the Automatic Assessment of Computational Thinking Skills: A Comparison with Human Experts
TL;DR: This paper compares the assessments provided by Dr. Scratch with over 450 evaluations of Scratch projects given by 16 experts in computer science education, and shows strong correlations between automatic and manual evaluations.