Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature for in vitro and ex vivo studies that evaluated the effect of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitors during the adhesive procedure on the immediate and long-term resin-dentin bond strength. The search was conducted in 6 databases with no publication year or language limits, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. From 1,336 potentially eligible studies, 48 were selected for full-text analysis, and 30 were included for review, with 17 considered in the meta-analysis. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. Pooled effect estimates were expressed as the weighted mean difference between groups. The most used MMP inhibitor was chlorhexidine (CHX). Immediate bond strength results showed no difference between 2% CHX and control; however, a difference was found between 0.2% CHX and control at baseline. After aging, CHX presented higher bond strength values compared to control groups (p < .05). However, this was not observed for longer periods of aging. High heterogeneity was found in some comparisons, especially for the water storage aging subgroup. Subgroup analyses showed that self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesives are benefited by the CHX use. From the studies included, only 1 presented low risk of bias, while the others showed medium or high risk of bias. The use of MMP inhibitors did not affect the immediate bond strength overall, while it influenced the aged bond strength. Aging procedures influenced bond strength values of the dentin adhesion stability.

/pdf/mmp-inhibitors-on-dentin-stability-a-systematic-review-and-2udsd3wiy6.pdf

MMP Inhibitors on Dentin Stability A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature to assess if low-temperature degradation (LTD) simulation in autoclave promotes deleterious impact on the mechanical properties and superficial characteristics of Y-TZP ceramics compared to the non-aged protocol. The MEDLINE via PubMed electronic database was searched with included peer-reviewed publications in English language and with no publication year limit. From 413 potentially eligible studies, 49 were selected for full-text analysis, 19 were included in the systematic review with 12 considered in the meta-analysis. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1, with random effects model, at a significance level of p 20h. However, for shorter aging times (≤20h), there was no difference between groups. Pressure subgroup analysis presented a statistical difference (p<0.05) only when a pressure ≥2bar was employed, favoring non-aging group. Temperature subgroup analysis showed a statistical difference (p<0.05) only when temperature=134°C was used, favoring the non-aging group. M-phase % content analysis presented statistical difference (p<0.05) when more than 50% of m-phase content was observed, favoring non-aging group. High heterogeneity was found in some comparisons. Aging in autoclave promoted low-temperature degradation, impacting deleteriously on mechanical properties of Y-TZP ceramics. However, the effect of LTD depends on some methodological parameters indicating that aging time higher than 20h; pressure ≥2bar and temperature of 134°C are ideal parameters to promote LTD effects, and that those effect are only observed when more than 50% m-phase content is observed.

Low-temperature degradation of Y-TZP ceramics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background Several restorative materials with specific indications are used for filling cavities in primary teeth. Aim To systematically review the literature in order to investigate the longevity of primary teeth restorations and the reasons for failure. Design Electronic databases were screened, and eligible studies were hand-searched to find longitudinal clinical studies evaluating the survival of restorations (class I, class II, and crown) placed with different materials in primary teeth with at least one year of follow-up. Results Thirty-one studies were included, and a high bias risk was observed. Overall, 12,047 restorations were evaluated with 12.5% of failure rate. A high variation on annual failure rate (AFR) was detected (0-29.9%). Composite resin showed the lowest AFRs (1.7-12.9%). Stainless steel crowns (SSC) had the highest success rate (96.1%). Class I restorations and restorations placed using rubber dam presented better AFR. The main reason for failure observed was secondary caries (36.5%). Conclusions An elevated number of failures were observed due to recurrent caries, highlighting the need for professionals to work with a health-promoting approach. The high variation on failure rate among the materials can be due to children's behavior during the procedure, which demands short dental appointments and a controlled environment.

Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures.

Composites resins have become the first choice for direct anterior and posterior restorations. The great popularity is related to their esthetic appearance and reduced need of sound tissue removal as compared with former treatments. Several studies have demonstrated that composite restorations may last long in clinical service. In this review we discuss the factors playing a role on the long-term longevity. Composite restorations have demonstrated a good clinical performance with annual failure rates varying from 1% to 3% in posterior teeth and 1% to 5% in anterior teeth. Factors related to the patients such as caries risk and occlusal stress risk, in addition to socioeconomic factors, may affect the survival significantly. Characteristics of the clinical operators, particularly their decision making when it comes to observing or approaching an existing restoration, are decisive for longevity. Cavity features such as the number of restored walls, composite volume, and presence of endodontic treatment are of major importance and may dictate the service time of the restorative approach. The choice of restorative composite seems to have a minor effect on longevity provided that appropriate technical procedures are used. The main reasons for failure in posterior teeth are secondary caries and fracture (restoration or tooth/restoration), while in anterior teeth esthetic concerns are the main reasons leading to restoration failures. Composite resin restorations can be considered a reliable treatment as long as both the professional and the patient are aware of the factors involved in restoration failures.

https://www.scielo.br/pdf/bor/v31s1/1807-3107-bor31-s1-e56.pdf

Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?

Because there are several ways to cement glass-fiber posts (GFPs) into root canals, there is no consensus on the best strategy to achieve high bond strengths. A systematic review was conducted to determine if there is difference in bond strength to dentin between regular and self-adhesive resin cements and to verify the influence of several variables on the retention of GFPs. This report followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. In vitro studies that investigated the bond strength of GFPs luted with self-adhesive and regular resin cements were selected. Searches were carried out in the PubMed and Scopus databases. No publication year or language limit was used, and the last search was done in October 2012. A global comparison was performed between self-adhesive and regular resin cements. Two subgroup analyses were performed: 1) Self-adhesive × Regular resin cement + Etch-and-rinse adhesive and 2) Self-adhesive × Regular resin cement + Self-etch adhesive. The analyses were carried out using fixed-effect and random-effects models. The results showed heterogeneity in all comparisons, and higher bond strength to dentin was identified for self-adhesive cements. Although the articles included in this meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity and high risk of bias, the in vitro literature seems to suggest that use of self-adhesive resin cement could improve the retention of GFPs into root canals.

The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.

A literature review was conducted to investigate the influence of patient-related factors on restoration survival in posterior permanent teeth as well as to report the methods used to collect these factors. The selection of articles on longitudinal clinical studies investigating the survival of posterior restorations (except full crowns and temporary fillings) and including patient-related factors was performed by applying predefined criteria. The review was organized into two parts, the first describing how patient factors were assessed in the studies (n=45) and the second presenting the statistical significance (n=27) and size of the effect (n=11) of these factors on restoration survival. Patient-related factors mentioned in the studies included age; gender; caries risk; caries activity/severity; decayed, missing, filled teeth; number of restorations; oral hygiene; and bruxism, among others. Sixteen studies included the patient age or age range in the analysis, which was found to be significant in 47% of the studies. Regarding gender, four of 17 reports found a significant effect on survival, showing more failures for men in three studies. The caries risk profile or related variables were included in the analysis of 15 studies, and a significant effect on survival was reported for high-caries-risk individuals (or related variables) in 67% of these studies. Bruxism was also found to influence restoration survival in three of six studies where this variable was investigated. Some issues were found regarding the reporting of methods used to classify patients according to risk and were thoroughly discussed. In view of the information gathered in this review, the assessment of patient factors along with other variables should become part of clinical studies investigating restoration survival, since several of these factors were shown to influence the failure of restorations, regardless of the material type.

/pdf/restoration-survival-revisiting-patients-risk-factors-3ay0q9j877.pdf

Restoration Survival: Revisiting Patients' Risk Factors Through a Systematic Literature Review.

Clinical Relevance The improved retention of glass-fiber posts (GFPs) with a combination of post pretreatment and silanization is of particular interest because it could impact the clinical surviva...

Can Silanization Increase the Retention of Glass-fiber posts? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of In Vitro Studies.

Clinical Relevance Both self-adhesive and regular resin cements obtained good survival rates and could be used for fiber post cementation.

A Multicenter Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial of Fiber Post Cementation Strategies

Clinical Relevance Remaining caries-affected dentin after the cavity preparation for indirect restorations results in reduced bond strength of adhesive luting agents.

/pdf/bonding-of-adhesive-luting-agents-to-caries-affected-dentin-7tp2m0xwof.pdf

Cenci

Papers

The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.

Restoration Survival: Revisiting Patients' Risk Factors Through a Systematic Literature Review.

Can Silanization Increase the Retention of Glass-fiber posts? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of In Vitro Studies.

A Multicenter Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial of Fiber Post Cementation Strategies

Bonding of Adhesive Luting Agents to Caries-affected Dentin Induced by a Microcosm Biofilm Model.