C
Charles Bazerman
Researcher at University of California, Santa Barbara
Publications - 116
Citations - 6179
Charles Bazerman is an academic researcher from University of California, Santa Barbara. The author has contributed to research in topics: Rhetorical question & Professional writing. The author has an hindex of 29, co-authored 112 publications receiving 5923 citations. Previous affiliations of Charles Bazerman include City University of New York & University of California.
Papers
More filters
Book
Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science
TL;DR: Bazerman as discussed by the authors argues that the emergence of the experimental scientific article is a response to the social and rhetorical situation of the 17th and 18th-century natural philosophy activated by the need to communicate findings and the exigencies of conflict that arise from communication.
Journal ArticleDOI
Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and the Activity of the Experimental Article in Science
Book
What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices
Charles Bazerman,Paul A Prior +1 more
TL;DR: This book discusses Speech Acts, Genres, and Activity Systems: How Texts Organize Activity and People, and Rhetorical Analysis: Understanding how Texts Persuade Readers, by C. Bazerman and P. Prior.
Book
Textual dynamics of the professions : historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities
Charles Bazerman,James Paradis +1 more
TL;DR: The role of text and action in the formation of discourse communities is discussed in this article, where a sociocognitire model of literacy is proposed for discourse communities and the operational force of texts is discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Physicists Reading Physics: Schema-Laden Purposes and Purpose-Laden Schema
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe a reading process permeated with individual purposes and schema, or personal maps of the field, which include not only consensual knowledge about the phenomena being discussed, but also perceptions as to the most promising lines of current work, methods that are most likely to produce good results, and personal knowledge about other workers in the field.