C
Charles C. Caldart
Researcher at Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Publications - 11
Citations - 104
Charles C. Caldart is an academic researcher from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Negotiation & Rulemaking. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 11 publications receiving 101 citations.
Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
Environmental Protection Laws
TL;DR: This article addresses the major regulatory systems designed to protect public and worker health from chemicals discharged from sources that pollute the air, water, ground, and/or workplace in the United States.
Journal ArticleDOI
Negotiated environmental and occupational health and safety agreements in the United States: lessons for policy
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe and analyze negotiated agreements in the United States in the context of EPA efforts to ensure environmental protection and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration effort to ensure worker health and safety.
Journal ArticleDOI
Law and Science Policy in Federal Regulation of Formaldehyde
TL;DR: An examination of the way in which the Environmental Protection Agency, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and Consumer Product Safety Commission each responded to evidence of formaldehyde's carcinogenicity in animal systems reveals the interplay between politics and science policy in regulatory determinations.
Journal ArticleDOI
Waste Generation Reduction: A First Step Toward Developing a Regulatory Policy to Encourage Hazardous Substance Management through Production Process Change
TL;DR: The long-term goal of a reasoned hazardous waste management policy must be to effect changes in industrial processes so as to reduce significantly the amount of hazardous residues generated by those processes as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
Negotiation as a Means of Developing and Implementing Environmental Policy
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined three negotiated rulemakings by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Air Act and evaluated whether negotiation was instrumental either in securing a more protective standard, or in securing an innovative technological response.