Showing papers by "Charles P. Ordahl published in 2000"

The growth of the dermomyotome and formation of early myotome lineages in thoracolumbar somites of chicken embryos.

Abstract: Myotome formation in the epaxial and hypaxial domains of thoraco-lumbar somites was analyzed using fluorescent vital dye labeling of dermomyotome cells and cell-fate assessment by confocal microscopy. Muscle precursor cells for the epaxial and hypaxial myotomes are predominantly located in the dorsomedial and ventrolateral dermomyotome lips, respectively, and expansion of the dermomyotome is greatest along its mediolateral axis coincident with the dorsalward and ventralward growth directions of the epaxial and hypaxial myotomes. Measurements of the dermomyotome at different stages of development shows that myotome growth begins earlier in the epaxial than in the hypaxial domain, but that after an initial lag phase, both progress at the same rate. A combination of dye injection and/or antibody labeling of early and late-expressed muscle contractile proteins confirms the myotome mediolateral growth directions, and shows that the myotome thickness increases in a superficial (near dermis) to deep (near sclerotome) growth direction. These findings also provide a basis for predicting the following gene expression sequence program for the earliest muscle precursor lineages in mouse embryos: Pax-3 (stem cells), myf-5 (myoblast cells) and myoD (myocytes). The movements and mitotic activity of early muscle precursor cells lead to the conclusion that patterning and growth in the myotome specifically, and in the epaxial and hypaxial domains of the body generally, are governed by morphogenetic cell movements.

Dorsoventral axis determination in the somite: a re-examination.

Abstract: We have repeated classic dorsoventral somite rotation experiments (Aoyama and Asamoto, 1988, Development 104, 15–28) and included dorsal and ventral gene expression markers for the somitogenic tissue types, myotome and sclerotome, respectively. While the histological results are consistent with those previously published, gene expression analysis indicates that cells previously thought to be ‘sclerotome’ no longer express Pax1 mRNA, a sclerotome marker. These results, together with recent quail-chick transplantation experiments indicating that even very late sclerotome tissue fragments are multipotential (Dockter and Ordahl, 1998, Development 125, 2113–2124), lead to the conclusion that sclerotome tissue remains phenotypically and morphogenetically plastic during early embryonic somitogenesis. Myotome precursor cells, by contrast, appear to be determined within hours after somite epithelization; a finding consistent with recent reports (Williams and Ordahl, 1997, Development 124, 4983–4997). Therefore, while these findings support a central conclusion of Aoyama and Asamoto, that axis determination begins to occur within hours after somite epithelialization, the identity of the responding tissues, myotome versus sclerotome, differs. A simple model proposed to reconcile these observations supports the general hypothesis that determinative aspects of early paraxial mesoderm growth and morphogenesis occur in early and late phases that are governed principally by the myotome and sclerotome, respectively.

Fate restriction in limb muscle precursor cells precedes high-level expression of MyoD family member genes.

Abstract: The mechanisms by which pluripotent embryonic cells generate unipotent tissue progenitor cells during development are unknown. Molecular/genetic experiments in cultured cells have led to the hypothesis that the product of a single member of the MyoD gene family (MDF) is necessary and sufficient to establish the positive aspects of the determined state of myogenic precursor cells: i.e., the ability to initiate and maintain the differentiated state (Weintraub, H., Davis, R., Tapscott, S., Thayer, M., Krause, M., Benezra, R., Blackwell, T. K., Turner, D., Rupp, R., Hollenberg, S. et al. (1991) Science 251, 761-766). Embryonic cell type determination also involves negative regulation, such as the restriction of developmental potential for alternative cell types, that is not directly addressed by the MDF model. In the experiments reported here, phenotypic restriction in myogenic precursor cells is assayed by an in vivo 'notochord challenge' to evaluate their potential to 'choose' between two alternative cell fate endpoints: cartilage and muscle (Williams, B. A. and Ordahl, C. P. (1997) Development 124, 4983-4997). Two separate myogenic precursor cell populations were found to be phenotypically restricted while expressing the Pax3 gene and prior to MDF gene activation. Therefore, while MDF family members act positively during myogenic differentiation, phenotypic restriction, the negative aspect of cell specification, requires cellular and molecular events and interactions that precede MDF expression in myogenic precursor cells. The qualities of muscle formed by the determined myogenic precursor cells in these experiments further indicate that their developmental potential is intermediate between that of myoblastic stem cells taken from fetal or adult tissue (which lack mitotic and morphogenetic potential when tested in vivo) and embryonic stem cells (which are multipotent). We hypothesize that such embryonic myogenic progenitor cells represent a distinct class of determined embryonic cell, one that is responsible for both tissue growth and tissue morphogenesis.