scispace - formally typeset
C

Charles W. Monroe

Researcher at University of Oxford

Publications -  104
Citations -  6111

Charles W. Monroe is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Electrolyte & Battery (electricity). The author has an hindex of 29, co-authored 93 publications receiving 4700 citations. Previous affiliations of Charles W. Monroe include University of Michigan & Imperial College London.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The impact of elastic deformation on deposition kinetics at lithium/polymer interfaces

TL;DR: In this paper, a Hookeanelastic model is used to compute the additional effect of bulk mechanical forces on electrode stability. But the authors assume that the surface tension resists the amplification of surface roughness at cathodes and show that instability at lithium/liquid interfaces cannot be prevented by surface forces alone.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dendrite Growth in Lithium/Polymer Systems A Propagation Model for Liquid Electrolytes under Galvanostatic Conditions

TL;DR: In this paper, surface energy controlled dendrite growth in a parallel-electrode poly(ethylene oxide)/LiTFSI cell during galvanostatic charging has been modeled.
Journal ArticleDOI

Direct in situ measurements of Li transport in Li-ion battery negative electrodes

TL;DR: In this article, the first direct in situ measurements of Li transport in an operating cell are described. But the model is only qualitatively successful in predicting observed Li transport rate data, suggesting that microstructural information is required and that the actual process is more complex than simply diffusion.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Effect of Interfacial Deformation on Electrodeposition Kinetics

TL;DR: A kinetic model is developed which additionally includes mechanical forces such as elasticity, viscous drag, and pressure, showing their effect on exchange current densities and potentials at roughening interfaces, and validating the proposed model and elucidating the fundamental assumptions on which the two previous theories rely.