OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the influences of accumulated experience on rotational atherectomy (RA) operation regarding to in-hospital outcomes in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era. METHODS Between 2015 and 2019, 540 de novo lesions with calcified coronary lesions treated by RA and DES implantation at our center were retrospectively assessed. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as all cause death, cardiac death, target vessel revascularization, and stroke. RESULTS From 2015 to 2019, RA operations were 22, 60, 102, 157, and 199 cases, respectively. Rates of procedural complications were 4.5, 3.3, 11.8, 8.3, and 7.5%, respectively. Rates of in-hospital MACE were 0, 0, 3.9, 2.5, and 2.0%, respectively. Compared with planned RA, bailout RA was associated with more contrast use (207.5 ± 82.8 ml vs. 189.2 ± 70.0 ml, p = .008). As for procedural complications and in-hospital outcomes, no differences were observed between two strategies. Logistic regression revealed that hypertension was independently associated with complications (OR 5.830, 95% CI 1.382-24.591, p = .016). For MACE, independent risk factors were heart failure (OR 17.593, 95% CI 1.475-209.816, p = .023) and procedural complications (OR 127.629, 95% CI 15.135-1,076.258, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS Along with the rapid increase of RA use and accumulated experience, rates of complications and MACE went up first and then dropped down. Hypertension was found to be an independent risk factor of procedural complications. For in-hospital MACE, independent risk factors were heart failure and procedural complications.

Outcomes of rotational atherectomy for severely calcified coronary lesions: A single center 5-year experience.

Planned versus bailout rotational atherectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Planned Versus Bailout Rotational Atherectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Coronary artery calcification is prevalent in coronary heart disease with its progression being predictive of future adverse cardiac events. Its presence is considered to be a marker of interventional procedural complexity. Several adjunctive percutaneous coronary intervention tools, such as modifying balloons, atherectomy devices and intravascular lithotripsy, now exist to successfully treat calcified lesions. In this state-of-the-art review, a step-wise progression of strategies is described to modify coronary plaque, from well-recognised techniques to techniques that should only be considered when standard manoeuvres have proven unsuccessful. Technology has advanced greatly over the past few decades and we discuss how future technologies might shape percutaneous intervention. 

A State-of-the-Art Review: The Percutaneous Treatment of Highly Calcified Lesions.

The Task Force on Rotational Atherectomy of the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) proposed the expert consensus document to summarize the techniques and evidences regarding rotational atherectomy (RA) in 2020. Because the revascularization strategy to severely calcified lesions is the hottest topic in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), many evidences related to RA have been published since 2020. Latest advancements have been incorporated in this updated expert consensus document. 

/pdf/clinical-expert-consensus-document-on-rotational-atherectomy-2hdnuwuc.pdf

Clinical expert consensus document on rotational atherectomy from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics: update 2023

To compare outcomes of bailout and planned rotational atherectomy (RA) in the treatment of severe calcified coronary lesions. Data of patients treated with RA from 2017 to 2018 at a single-center registry were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into planned RA and bailout RA groups, data between two groups were compared. A total of 190 patients were included in this study, 138 patients received planned RA and 52 patients received bailout RA. Baseline clinical characteristics had no significant differences between groups. The number of implanted stents and total stents length were similar. But the number of balloon (1.6 ± 0.8 vs. 2.7 ± 1.3, P < 0.001), procedure time (83.5 ± 26.2 vs. 100.8 ± 36.4 min, P = 0.007), fluoroscopy volume (941 ± 482 vs. 1227 ± 872 mGy, P = 0.012] and contrast amount (237 ± 62 vs. 275 ± 90 ml, P = 0.003) were all lower in planned RA group. Planned RA had a higher procedural success rate (99.3% vs. 92.3%, P = 0.007) and a lower complication incidence (4.3% vs. 17.3%, P = 0.009). But the primary outcomes at 3 years (9.2 and 16.6%, log rank p = 0.24) had no difference between groups. For severe coronary artery calcification, although planned RA did not improved the long term prognosis compared with bailout RA, but it can improve the immediate procedural success rate, reduce the incidence of complications, the procedure time and the volume of contrast.

/pdf/comparison-of-bailout-and-planned-rotational-atherectomy-for-2pmdsm1blv.pdf

Comparison of bailout and planned rotational atherectomy for severe coronary calcified lesions.

To compare the effect and outcomes of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided rotational atherectomy (RA) with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided RA in the treatment of calcified coronary lesions. Data of calcified coronary lesions treated with RA that underwent OCT-guided or IVUS-guided from January 2016 to December 2019 at a single-center registry were retrospectively analyzed. The effect and outcomes between underwent OCT-guided RA and IVUS-guided RA were compared. A total of 33 lesions in 32 patients received OCT-guided RA and 51 lesions in 47 patients received IVUS-guided RA. There was no significant difference between OCT-guided RA group and IVUS-guided RA group in clinical baselines characteristics. Comparing the procedural and lesions characteristics of the two groups, the contrast volume was larger [(348.8 ± 110.6) ml vs. (275.2 ± 76.8) ml, P = 0.002] and the scoring balloon was more frequently performed (33.3% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.001) after RA and before stenting in the OCT-guided RA group. Comparing the intravascular imaging findings of the two groups, stent expansion was significantly larger in the OCT-guided RA group ([82 ± 8]% vs. [75 ± 9]%, P = 0.001). Both groups achieved procedural success immediately. There were no significantly differences in the incidence of complications. Although there was no statistical difference in the occurrence of MACE at 1 year between OCT-guided RA group and IVUS-guided RA group (3.1% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.517), no cardiovascular death, TVR and stent thrombosis occurred in OCT-guided RA group. OCT-guided RA compared to IVUS-guided RA for treating calcified coronary lesions resulted in better stent expansion and may have improved prognosis.

/pdf/comparison-of-optical-coherence-tomography-guided-and-475w8sbmnj.pdf

Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided rotational atherectomy for calcified coronary lesions.

/pdf/correction-left-ventricular-function-and-coronary-1br7ly00.pdf

Correction: Left ventricular function and coronary microcirculation in patients with mild reduced ejection fraction after STEMI

Abstract Background The characteristics of heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced ejection fraction (EF) (HFmrEF) overlap with those of HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) and need to be further explored. This study aimed to evaluate left ventricular (LV) function and coronary microcirculation in patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods We enrolled 119 patients with STEMI who had undergone speckle tracking imaging and myocardial contrast echocardiography during hospitalization from June 2016 to June 2021. They were classified into normal, HFmrEF, and HFrEF groups according to their left ventricular EF (LVEF): ≥ 50%, 40–50%, and ≤ 40%, respectively. The data of the HFmrEF group were analyzed and compared with those of the normal and HFrEF groups. Results HFmrEF was observed in 32 patients (26.9%), HFrEF in 17 (14.3%), and normal LVEF in 70 patients (58.8%). The mean global longitudinal strain (GLS) of all patients was − 11.9 ± 3.8%. The GLS of HFmrEF patients was not significantly different from that of the HFrEF group (− 9.9 ± 2.5% and − 8.0 ± 2.3%, respectively, P = 0.052), but they were both lower than that of the normal group (− 13.8% ± 3.5%, P &lt; 0.001). The HFmrEF group exhibited significantly poorer myocardial perfusion index (1.24 ± 0.33) than the normal group (1.08 ± 0.14, P = 0.005) but displayed no significant difference from the HFrEF group (1.18 ± 0.19, P = 0.486). Moreover, a significant difference in the incidence of regional wall motion (WM) abnormalities in the three groups was observed ( P = 0.009), and the WM score index of patients with HFmrEF was 1.76 ± 0.30, similar to that of patients with HFrEF (1.81 ± 0.43, P = 0.618), but poorer than that in the normal group (1.33 ± 0.25, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions GLS is a more sensitive tool than LVEF for detecting LV systolic dysfunction. The LV systolic function, coronary microcirculation, and WM in patients with HFmrEF was poorer than that of patients with normal LVEF, but comparable to that in patients with HFrEF. Patients with HFmrEF after STEMI require more attention and appropriate management. 

/pdf/left-ventricular-function-and-coronary-microcirculation-in-36l3umb4.pdf

Left ventricular function and coronary microcirculation in patients with mild reduced ejection fraction after STEMI


Objective: This study compared the long-term outcomes between rotational atherectomy (RA) for specific indications and on-label use of RA for severely calcified coronary lesions.

Methods: Data for patients who underwent RA between 2015 and 2020 in a single-center registry were analyzed. The specific indication group included patients with ostial lesions, unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis, chronic total occlusions, stent ablation, angulated lesions, and cardiac dysfunction, whereas patients with none of the above-mentioned characteristics were included in the on-label group. The primary endpoint was compared between groups.

Results: A total of 176 patients in the on-label group and 125 patients in the specific indication group were included. Patient clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. The incidence of complications during the procedure was higher in the specific indication group than in the on-label group (20.0% vs. 10.8%, P=0.018). No significant difference was observed in in-hospital MACCE between groups (12.5% vs 9.7%, P=0.392). During 35 (10–57) months of follow-up, MACCE occurred in 46 patients (15.3%). The incidence of MACCE was much higher in the specific indication group than the on-label group (25.6% vs 13.6%, P=0.034).

Conclusions: RA for specific indications, compared with on-label use, had a higher incidence of complications during the procedure and poorer long-term clinical outcomes.

/pdf/long-term-clinical-outcomes-of-coronary-rotational-2hmph4dl.pdf

Cheng-fu Cao

Papers

Comparison of bailout and planned rotational atherectomy for severe coronary calcified lesions.

Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided rotational atherectomy for calcified coronary lesions.

Correction: Left ventricular function and coronary microcirculation in patients with mild reduced ejection fraction after STEMI

Left ventricular function and coronary microcirculation in patients with mild reduced ejection fraction after STEMI

Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Rotational Atherectomy for Specific Indications