scispace - formally typeset
C

Christina Rott

Researcher at VU University Amsterdam

Publications -  10
Citations -  154

Christina Rott is an academic researcher from VU University Amsterdam. The author has contributed to research in topics: Blame & Regret. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 10 publications receiving 93 citations. Previous affiliations of Christina Rott include Autonomous University of Barcelona & Maastricht University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The impact of advice on women's and men's selection into competition

TL;DR: The overall gender gap persists even though it disappears among low and strong performers, and the persistence is due to an emerging gender gap among intermediate performers driven by women following more the advice to stay out of the tournament in this performance group.
Journal ArticleDOI

Not just like starting over - Leadership and revivification of cooperation in groups

TL;DR: In this article, the authors study how, after a history of decay, cooperation in a repeated voluntary contribution game can be revived in an enduring way, and find evidence that repeated free-form communication by the leader further strengthens the reviving effect on cooperation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Increasing Workplace Diversity Evidence from a Recruiting Experiment at a Fortune 500 Company

TL;DR: This article used a natural field experiment to test several hypotheses on effective means to attract minority candidates for top professional careers, and found that signaling explicit interest in employee diversity more than doubled the interest in openings among racial minority candidates, as well as the likelihood that they apply and are selected.
Book ChapterDOI

Communication in laboratory experiments

TL;DR: This chapter presents a first survey of laboratory studies using communication and surveys a number of issues about the implementation of communication in the laboratory, including variations in the channels, the structure and the content analysis of communication.
Journal ArticleDOI

Shifting Blame? Experimental Evidence of Delegating Communication

TL;DR: This paper found that receivers punish both the decision maker and the spokesperson more often, and more heavily, for unfair allocations communicated by the spokesperson if there is room for shifting blame. But they also found that the increased punishment results from the messenger's style of delivery: spokespersons are more likely than decision makers to express emotional regret instead of rational need.