scispace - formally typeset
C

Christine S. Scott-Hayward

Researcher at California State University, Long Beach

Publications -  17
Citations -  92

Christine S. Scott-Hayward is an academic researcher from California State University, Long Beach. The author has contributed to research in topics: Criminal justice & Economic Justice. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 15 publications receiving 79 citations. Previous affiliations of Christine S. Scott-Hayward include California State University & New York University.

Papers
More filters
Posted Content

Does Privacy Require Secrecy? Societal Expectations of Privacy in the Digital Age

TL;DR: Overall, it is found that individuals consistently have significantly high expectations in virtually all of their digital information, even information in which courts have held that they have no expectation of privacy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bail and Pretrial Justice in the United States: A Field of Possibility

TL;DR: The field of bail provides extensive opportunities for generating revenue and containing, controlling, and changing defendants and their families and, in pursuit of these objectives, actors consistently generate harms that disproportionately affect low-income people of color and amplify social inequalities as discussed by the authors .
Journal ArticleDOI

Cheap on Crime: Recession-Era Politics and the Transformation of American Punishment. By Hadar Aviram. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2015. 272 pp. $29.95 paper.

TL;DR: Cheap on Crime: Recession-Era Politics and the Transformation of American Punishment by Hadar Aviram as discussed by the authors argues that efforts like these are facilitated by "humonetarianism," which she describesas"asetofrhetoricalarguments, political strategies, correctional policies, and cultural perceptions that focuses on cost-saving and financial prudence as its raison d'^etre" (p. 11).
Posted Content

Punishing Poverty: California's Unconstitutional Bail System

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that bail schedules are unconstitutional because they are used presumptively in a way that typically denies defendants the individualized pretrial detention determination to which they are entitled.