The processes present in a turbulent boundary layer (BL) which experiences a sudden change in the surface roughness are discussed in terms of numerical models in comparison with empirical data. Consideration is limited to flow perturbations which preserve the BL approximation. Generalized continuity, momentum and turbulent energy transport equations are reviewed. The perturbed BL has two regions: one with large velocity gradients and an outer zone with smaller gradients. Expressions are defined for the velocity and temperature profiles and the roughness length after a step change in surface roughness, which causes the disturbance. A pertrurbation could also arise from a heat flux input of a pressure gradient. The effects of the shape of the perturbing step and the presence of several disturbing edges are explored. Finally, it is shown that closure forms and constants for self-preserving flows are worthy of further development because of their demonstrable abilities to describe simple perturbed flows.

The response of turbulent boundary layers to sudden perturbations

On management and control of turbulent shear flows

Paper presents a review and summary of turbulent drag reduction approaches applicable to external flows. Because relatively recent and exhaustive reviews exist for laminar flow control and polymer (hydrodynamic) drag reduction, the paper focuses upon the emerging areas of nonplanar geometry and large eddy alteration. Turbulent control techniques for air generally result in modest (but technologically significant) drag reductions (order of 20 percent or less) whereas hydrodynamic approaches can yield drag reductions the order of 70 percent. Paper also includes suggestions for alternative concepts and optimization of existing approaches.

Turbulent drag reduction for external flows

Most of the detailed turbulence-structure data available pertain only to the simplest cases, involving zero pressure-gradient boundary layers and free-shear layers, and indicate that each disparate geometry possesses its own set of dominant nonlinear instabilities. Various boundary/input conditions act to modify these instabilities for low input levels; for stronger inputs, the basic instability modes/structures sustaining the turbulence field may be altered. Steady-state inputs are noted to be extremely effective in altering turbulence structures, in the directions of either amplification or diminution.

Turbulence Control in Wall Flows

Turbulent drag reduction research at NASA langley: progress and plans☆

Paper reviews large eddy behavior in turbulent boundary layers and presents a survey of turbulent wall layers subjected to abrupt changes in boundary conditions. From this survey several methods have been identified with potential for altering the turbulence production process in the outer region of the boundary layer and reducing the turbulent skin-friction drag over relatively long downstream distances; these include convex longitudinal surface curvature, large-eddy breakup devices, and Emmons spot alteration. Paper also presents results of an ongoing experimental study to parametrically evaluate large-eddy breakup devices as a turbulent drag reduction concept and reproduce the 20 percent net drag reductions found in large-eddy breakup experiments at Illinois Institute of Technology.

Alteration of outer flow structures for turbulent drag reduction

Large-eddy alteration techniques were used to modify the drag characteristics of the turbulent boundary layer. Local skin-friction coefficients were measured for single and multi-element arrays of thin plates suspended in a fully turbulent, flat plate, boundary layer at R(theta) = 3,000. Effects of these devices were measured more than 300 boundary-layer thicknesses downstream to R(theta) = 17,000. It was found that although most of the devices reduced the local skin friction immediately downstream, this reduced skin-friction region persisted for only 100-120 delta-0, after which a rapid rise in skin-friction coefficient occurred, often exceeding flat plate values. Net drag reductions were obtained only for tandem configurations and these reductions were sensitive to device spacing and height. The maximum net drag reduction reported was approximately 7 percent with a device spacing of 10 delta-0 at a height of 0.8 delta-0.

D. M. Bushnell

Papers

Alteration of outer flow structures for turbulent drag reduction

Performance of large-eddy breakup devices at post-transitional Reynolds numbers