Water transport in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells

In this review, we have examined the different models for polymer-electrolyte fuel cells operating with hydrogen. The major focus has been on transport of the various species within the fuel cell. The different regions of the fuel cell were examined, and their modeling methodologies and equations were elucidated. In particular, the 1-D fuel-cell sandwich was discussed thoroughly because it is the most important part of the fuel-cell assembly. Models that included other effects such as temperature gradients and transport in other directions besides through the fuel-cell sandwich were also discussed. Models were not directly compared to each other; instead they were broken down into their constitutive parts. The reason for this is that validation of the models is usually accomplished by comparison of simulation to experimental polarization data (e.g., Figure 3). However, other data can also be used such as the net flux of water through the membrane. In fitting these data, the models vary not only in their complexity and treatments but also in their number and kind of fitting parameters. This is one reason it is hard to justify one approach over another by just looking at the modeling results. In general, it seems reasonable that the more complex models, which are based on physical arguments and do not contain many fitting parameters, are perhaps closest to reality. Of course, this assumes that they fit the experimental data and observations. This last point has been overlooked in the validation of many models. For example, a model may fit the data very well for certain operating conditions, but if it does not at least predict the correct trend when one of those conditions is changed, then the model is shown to be valid only within a certain operating range. This review has highlighted the important effects that should be modeled. These include two-phase flow of liquid water and gas in the fuel-cell sandwich, a robust membrane model that accounts for the different membrane transport modes, nonisothermal effects, especially in the directions perpendicular to the sandwich, and multidimensional effects such as changing gas composition along the channel, among others. For any model, a balance must be struck between the complexity required to describe the physical reality and the additional costs of such complexity. In other words, while more complex models more accurately describe the physics of the transport processes, they are more computationally costly and may have so many unknown parameters that their results are not as meaningful. Hopefully, this review has shown and broken down for the reader the vast complexities of transport within polymer-electrolyte fuel cells and the various ways they have been and can be modeled.

Modeling transport in polymer-electrolyte fuel cells.

This paper, the third in a series of four review papers to appear in this journal, presents a number of descriptions of various modeling and simulation techniques and, briefly, the associated experimental results in connection with ionic polymer–metal composites and, in general, ionic polymer–conductor composites, as soft biomimetic distributed sensors, actuators, transducers, and artificial muscles.

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0964-1726/13/6/009/pdf

Ionic polymer–metal composites: III. Modeling and simulation as biomimetic sensors, actuators, transducers, and artificial muscles

A review on water balance in the membrane electrode assembly of proton exchange membrane fuel cells

In this part of the paper, we present a model to treat formation and transport of liquid water in proton exchange membrane ~PEM! fuel cells ~FCs! in three-dimensional ~3-D! geometry. The performance of modern-day PEM FCs at high current density are largely dictated by the effective management of liquid water. In the first part of this paper, a rigorous model was presented to model PEM FCs using a computational fluid dynamic technique. It was found that under the assumption of no liquid water formation, the model consistently overpredicted measured polarization behavior. In the model presented here, the phase change process is modeled as an equilibrium process, while the transport of liquid water is governed by pressure, surface tension, gravity and electro-osmotic drag. Results show that the inclusion of liquid water transport greatly enhances the predictive capability of the model and is necessary to match experimental data at high current density.

Rigorous 3-d mathematical modeling of PEM fuel cells - II. Model predictions with liquid water transport

https://www.engr.uvic.ca/~ndjilali/Papers/IJES_Singh%20et%20al_1999.pdf

D. Singh

Papers

A two-dimensional analysis of mass transport in proton exchange membrane fuel cells