ContextAbout 5% of the US population is morbidly obese. This disease remains
largely refractory to diet and drug therapy, but generally responds well to
bariatric surgery.ObjectiveTo determine the impact of bariatric surgery on weight loss, operative
mortality outcome, and 4 obesity comorbidities (diabetes, hyperlipidemia,
hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea).Data Sources and Study SelectionElectronic literature search of MEDLINE, Current Contents, and the Cochrane
Library databases plus manual reference checks of all articles on bariatric
surgery published in the English language between 1990 and 2003. Two levels
of screening were used on 2738 citations.Data ExtractionA total of 136 fully extracted studies, which included 91 overlapping
patient populations (kin studies), were included for a total of 22 094
patients. Nineteen percent of the patients were men and 72.6% were women,
with a mean age of 39 years (range, 16-64 years). Sex was not reported for
1537 patients (8%). The baseline mean body mass index for 16 944 patients
was 46.9 (range, 32.3-68.8).Data SynthesisA random effects model was used in the meta-analysis. The mean (95%
confidence interval) percentage of excess weight loss was 61.2% (58.1%-64.4%)
for all patients; 47.5% (40.7%-54.2%) for patients who underwent gastric banding;
61.6% (56.7%-66.5%), gastric bypass; 68.2% (61.5%-74.8%), gastroplasty; and
70.1% (66.3%-73.9%), biliopancreatic diversion or duodenal switch. Operative
mortality (≤30 days) in the extracted studies was 0.1% for the purely restrictive
procedures, 0.5% for gastric bypass, and 1.1% for biliopancreatic diversion
or duodenal switch. Diabetes was completely resolved in 76.8% of patients
and resolved or improved in 86.0%. Hyperlipidemia improved in 70% or more
of patients. Hypertension was resolved in 61.7% of patients and resolved or
improved in 78.5%. Obstructive sleep apnea was resolved in 85.7% of patients
and was resolved or improved in 83.6% of patients.ConclusionsEffective weight loss was achieved in morbidly obese patients after
undergoing bariatric surgery. A substantial majority of patients with diabetes,
hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea experienced complete
resolution or improvement.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/199587/JRV40082.pdf

Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundLong-term results from randomized, controlled trials that compare medical therapy with surgical therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes are limited. MethodsWe assessed outcomes 5 years after 150 patients who had type 2 diabetes and a body-mass index (BMI; the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) of 27 to 43 were randomly assigned to receive intensive medical therapy alone or intensive medical therapy plus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. The primary outcome was a glycated hemoglobin level of 6.0% or less with or without the use of diabetes medications. ResultsOf the 150 patients who underwent randomization, 1 patient died during the 5-year follow-up period; 134 of the remaining 149 patients (90%) completed 5 years of follow-up. At baseline, the mean (±SD) age of the 134 patients was 49±8 years, 66% were women, the mean glycated hemoglobin level was 9.2±1.5%, and the mean BMI was 37±3.5. At 5 years, the criterion for the primary end point was met by 2...

/pdf/bariatric-surgery-versus-intensive-medical-therapy-for-1sp60mr7eq.pdf

Bariatric Surgery versus Intensive Medical Therapy for Diabetes — 5-Year Outcomes

Of the 150 patients, 93% completed 12 months of follow-up. The proportion of patients with the primary end point was 12% (5 of 41 patients) in the medicaltherapy group versus 42% (21 of 50 patients) in the gastric-bypass group (P = 0.002) and 37% (18 of 49 patients) in the sleeve-gastrectomy group (P = 0.008). Glycemic control improved in all three groups, with a mean glycated hemoglobin level of 7.5±1.8% in the medical-therapy group, 6.4±0.9% in the gastric-bypass group (P<0.001), and 6.6±1.0% in the sleeve-gastrectomy group (P = 0.003). Weight loss was greater in the gastric-bypass group and sleeve-gastrectomy group (−29.4±9.0 kg and −25.1±8.5 kg, respectively) than in the medical-therapy group (−5.4±8.0 kg) (P<0.001 for both com parisons). The use of drugs to lower glucose, lipid, and blood-pressure levels decreased significantly after both surgical procedures but increased in patients receiving medical therapy only. The index for homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) improved significantly after bariatric surgery. Four patients underwent reoperation. There were no deaths or life-threatening complications. Conclusions In obese patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, 12 months of medical therapy plus bariatric surgery achieved glycemic control in significantly more patients than medical therapy alone. Further study will be necessary to assess the durability of these results. (Funded by Ethicon Endo-Surgery and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00432809.)

/pdf/bariatric-surgery-versus-intensive-medical-therapy-in-obese-11c2yyyjpu.pdf

Bariatric Surgery versus Intensive Medical Therapy in Obese Patients with Diabetes

The mean (±SD) age of the patients at baseline was 48±8 years, 68% were women, the mean baseline glycated hemoglobin level was 9.3±1.5%, and the mean baseline body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) was 36.0±3.5. A total of 91% of the patients completed 36 months of follow-up. At 3 years, the criterion for the primary end point was met by 5% of the patients in the medical-therapy group, as compared with 38% of those in the gastric-bypass group (P<0.001) and 24% of those in the sleeve-gastrectomy group (P = 0.01). The use of glucose-lowering medications, including insulin, was lower in the surgical groups than in the medical-therapy group. Patients in the surgical groups had greater mean percentage reductions in weight from baseline, with reductions of 24.5±9.1% in the gastric-bypass group and 21.1±8.9% in the sleeve-gastrectomy group, as compared with a reduction of 4.2±8.3% in the medical-therapy group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Quality-of-life measures were significantly better in the two surgical groups than in the medical-therapy group. There were no major late surgical complications. Conclusions Among obese patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, 3 years of intensive medical therapy plus bariatric surgery resulted in glycemic control in significantly more patients than did medical therapy alone. Analyses of secondary end points, including body weight, use of glucose-lowering medications, and quality of life, also showed favorable results at 3 years in the surgical groups, as compared with the group receiving medical therapy alone. (Funded by Ethicon and others; STAMPEDE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00432809.)

/pdf/bariatric-surgery-versus-intensive-medical-therapy-for-2qx6i5evnm.pdf

Bariatric Surgery versus Intensive Medical Therapy for Diabetes — 3-Year Outcomes

Since the introduction of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) in the early 1990s, several investigators have demonstrated that LRYGBP is as effective as open roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) in achieving significant long-term weight loss (60–80% percent of excess body weight loss [%EWL]) in morbidly obese patients while significantly reducing perioperative morbidity and recovery time.1–5 In 2000, our group reported (n = 275 patients) a mean excess weight loss of 77% (mean body mass index [BMI] reduced from 48 to 27 kg/m2) at 30 months and a major morbidity and mortality rate of 3.3% and 0.4%, respectively.2 Quality of life was significantly improved and all obesity comorbidities, with the exception of depression, were significantly improved or resolved. Although that study did not focus specifically on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), we did find that 82% of T2DM patients (n = 18) achieved clinical resolution (withdrawal of all antidiabetic medication) whereas the remaining 18% had significant improvement. Other investigators have also demonstrated that not only Roux-en-Y gastric bypass but other bariatric operations may result in significant clinical improvement in T2DM after weight loss.2,5–13 However, little is known concerning the effect of weight loss surgery on the degree of glycemic control that is achieved and its impact on antidiabetic medication requirement. Furthermore, factors that may be associated with postoperative resolution versus improvement in diabetes have not been fully elucidated.

The goal of this study then was to evaluate the effect of LRYGBP on morbidly obese patients with T2DM and their related comorbidites and diabetes-specific complications. Our hypothesis was that LRYGBP would result in sustained weight loss that would correspond to significant improvement in glycemic control, leading to clinical resolution or improvement in T2DM and related comorbidites and complications. We specifically evaluated postoperative outcomes, including surgical complications and weight loss as well as changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C), diabetic medication requirement, and changes in comorbidity and diabetes complications.

Effect of laparoscopic Roux-en Y gastric bypass on type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Objective: To evaluate pre- and postoperative clinical parameters associated with improvement of diabetes up to 4 years after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Summary background data: The surgical treatment of morbid obesity leads to dramatic improvement in the comorbidity status of most patients with T2DM. However, little is known concerning what preoperative clinical factors are associated with postoperative long-term improvement in diabetes in the morbidly obese patient with diabetes. Methods: We evaluated pre- and postoperative data, including demographics, duration of diabetes, metabolic parameters, and clinical outcomes, in all patients with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and type T2DM undergoing LRYGBP from July 1997 to May 2002. Results: During this 5-year period, 1160 patients underwent LRYGBP, and 240 (21%) had IFG or T2DM. Follow-up was possible in 191 of 240 patients (80%). There were 144 women (75%) with a mean preoperative age o...

Effect of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

THE TECHNIQUE OF LAPAROSCOPIC Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has evolved significantly since Wittgrove and Clark developed their technique in the early 1990s.1 Multiple variations of each key aspect of the procedure have evolved.2–8 The major steps of the procedure include patient positioning, setup and port placement, pouch creation, Roux-limb construction, jejuno-jejunostomy, and gastrojejunostomy. Table 1 lists the multiple variations of each major step along with their advantages and disadvantages. The most complex step of the procedure is the gastrojejunostomy, which correspondingly varies most from surgeon to surgeon. Our approach to the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at the University of Pittsburgh has also evolved since we began our laparoscopic bariatric program in July of 1997. Our goal has been simplification of the procedure to reduce technical complications, facilitate teaching it to our fellows, residents, and visiting surgeons, and complete each case consistently within 1.5 to 2.5 hours. Our current experience as of January 2003 is approximately 2000 cases, and we have taught the procedure to more than 500 surgeons, including residents and fellows. In our first technique (cases 1–150), adapted from the method of Wittgrove and Clark, we created a retrocolic, retrogastric Roux-limb and used a circular stapler for the gastrojejunal anastomosis. The anvil was placed within the gastric pouch by passing it through the mouth with a pull wire technique. This method worked quite well, but we found that by using a linear stapler (cases 151–850) for the gastrojejunal anastomosis, as described by Champion et al.,3 we could simplify the procedure significantly. With the linear stapler, we observed a reduction (from 3% to less than 1%) in the rate of wound infections related to withdrawal of the contaminated circular stapler through the port site. We also achieved a 15to 30-minute reduction in operating time with the linear stapler. In our most recent modification (cases 851–2000), we switched from a retrocolic, retrogastric Roux-limb to an antecolic, antegastric Roux-limb, as described by Gagner et al.4 This modification has resulted in a significant reduction in the number of internal hernias caused by protrusion of the bowel through the mesocolon defect required in the retrocolic technique. Furthermore, we have not seen an increase in the number of complications resulting from the increased tension at the gastrojejunal anastomosis that is required with an antecolic Roux-limb. Thus, our current technique, which we describe and illustrate in this article, involves the following: a 15-mL gastric pouch; a two-layer gastrojejunal anastomosis (sutured outer layer and stapled inner layer); an antecolic, antegastric Rouxlimb; and an end-side (stapled) jejuno-jejunostomy.

Dan Cottam

Papers

Effect of laparoscopic Roux-en Y gastric bypass on type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Effect of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Surgery: Current Technique