List of Figures. List of Tables. Preface. Foreword. 1. Basic Concepts. 2. Evolutionary Algorithm MOP Approaches. 3. MOEA Test Suites. 4. MOEA Testing and Analysis. 5. MOEA Theory and Issues. 3. MOEA Theoretical Issues. 6. Applications. 7. MOEA Parallelization. 8. Multi-Criteria Decision Making. 9. Special Topics. 10. Epilog. Appendix A: MOEA Classification and Technique Analysis. Appendix B: MOPs in the Literature. Appendix C: Ptrue & PFtrue for Selected Numeric MOPs. Appendix D: Ptrue & PFtrue for Side-Constrained MOPs. Appendix E: MOEA Software Availability. Appendix F: MOEA-Related Information. Index. References.

/pdf/evolutionary-algorithms-for-solving-multi-objective-problems-2txxk4mqci.pdf

Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems

Introduction to support vector learning roadmap. Part 1 Theory: three remarks on the support vector method of function estimation, Vladimir Vapnik generalization performance of support vector machines and other pattern classifiers, Peter Bartlett and John Shawe-Taylor Bayesian voting schemes and large margin classifiers, Nello Cristianini and John Shawe-Taylor support vector machines, reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces, and randomized GACV, Grace Wahba geometry and invariance in kernel based methods, Christopher J.C. Burges on the annealed VC entropy for margin classifiers - a statistical mechanics study, Manfred Opper entropy numbers, operators and support vector kernels, Robert C. Williamson et al. Part 2 Implementations: solving the quadratic programming problem arising in support vector classification, Linda Kaufman making large-scale support vector machine learning practical, Thorsten Joachims fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization, John C. Platt. Part 3 Applications: support vector machines for dynamic reconstruction of a chaotic system, Davide Mattera and Simon Haykin using support vector machines for time series prediction, Klaus-Robert Muller et al pairwise classification and support vector machines, Ulrich Kressel. Part 4 Extensions of the algorithm: reducing the run-time complexity in support vector machines, Edgar E. Osuna and Federico Girosi support vector regression with ANOVA decomposition kernels, Mark O. Stitson et al support vector density estimation, Jason Weston et al combining support vector and mathematical programming methods for classification, Bernhard Scholkopf et al.

Advances in kernel methods: support vector learning

An important issue in multiobjective optimization is the quantitative comparison of the performance of different algorithms. In the case of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms, the outcome is usually an approximation of the Pareto-optimal set, which is denoted as an approximation set, and therefore the question arises of how to evaluate the quality of approximation sets. Most popular are methods that assign each approximation set a vector of real numbers that reflect different aspects of the quality. Sometimes, pairs of approximation sets are also considered. In this study, we provide a rigorous analysis of the limitations underlying this type of quality assessment. To this end, a mathematical framework is developed which allows one to classify and discuss existing techniques.

/pdf/performance-assessment-of-multiobjective-optimizers-an-wf8l3c8h73.pdf

Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review

A unified view of metaheuristics This book provides a complete background on metaheuristics and shows readers how to design and implement efficient algorithms to solve complex optimization problems across a diverse range of applications, from networking and bioinformatics to engineering design, routing, and scheduling. It presents the main design questions for all families of metaheuristics and clearly illustrates how to implement the algorithms under a software framework to reuse both the design and code. Throughout the book, the key search components of metaheuristics are considered as a toolbox for: Designing efficient metaheuristics (e.g. local search, tabu search, simulated annealing, evolutionary algorithms, particle swarm optimization, scatter search, ant colonies, bee colonies, artificial immune systems) for optimization problems Designing efficient metaheuristics for multi-objective optimization problems Designing hybrid, parallel, and distributed metaheuristics Implementing metaheuristics on sequential and parallel machines Using many case studies and treating design and implementation independently, this book gives readers the skills necessary to solve large-scale optimization problems quickly and efficiently. It is a valuable reference for practicing engineers and researchers from diverse areas dealing with optimization or machine learning; and graduate students in computer science, operations research, control, engineering, business and management, and applied mathematics.

/pdf/metaheuristics-from-design-to-implementation-1vqdfv8nk9.pdf

Metaheuristics: From Design to Implementation

A multiobjective optimization problem involves several conflicting objectives and has a set of Pareto optimal solutions. By evolving a population of solutions, multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) are able to approximate the Pareto optimal set in a single run. MOEAs have attracted a lot of research effort during the last 20 years, and they are still one of the hottest research areas in the field of evolutionary computation. This paper surveys the development of MOEAs primarily during the last eight years. It covers algorithmic frameworks such as decomposition-based MOEAs (MOEA/Ds), memetic MOEAs, coevolutionary MOEAs, selection and offspring reproduction operators, MOEAs with specific search methods, MOEAs for multimodal problems, constraint handling and MOEAs, computationally expensive multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs), dynamic MOPs, noisy MOPs, combinatorial and discrete MOPs, benchmark problems, performance indicators, and applications. In addition, some future research issues are also presented.

Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A survey of the state of the art

The success of modern heuristics (Simulated Annealing (S.A.), Tabu Search, Genetic Algorithms, …) in solving classical combinatorial optimization problems has drawn the attention of the research community in multicriteria methods.



In fact, for large-scale problems, the simultaneous difficulties of -hard complexity and of multiobjective framework make most Multiobjective Combinatorial Optimization (MOCO) problems intractable for exact methods.



This paper develops the so-called MOSA (Multiobjective Simulated Annealing) method to approximate the set of efficient solutions of a MOCO problem. Different options for the implementation are illustrated and extensive experiments prove the efficiency of the approach. Its results are compared to exact methods on bi-objective knapsack problems. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

MOSA method: a tool for solving multiobjective combinatorial optimization problems

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00639966/document

A parallel bi-objective hybrid metaheuristic for energy-aware scheduling for cloud computing systems

Solving multi-objective production scheduling problems using metaheuristics

The classical linear Assignment problem is considered with two objectives. The aim is to generate the set of efficient solutions. An exact method is first developed based on the two-phase approach. In the second phase a new upper bound is proposed so that larger instances can be solved exactly. The so-called MOSA (Multi-Objective Simulated Annealing) is then recalleds its efficiency is improved by initialization with a greedy approach. Its results are compared to those obtained with the exact method. Extensive numerical experiments have been realized to measure the performance of the MOSA method.

Daniel Tuyttens

Papers

MOSA method: a tool for solving multiobjective combinatorial optimization problems

A parallel bi-objective hybrid metaheuristic for energy-aware scheduling for cloud computing systems

Solving multi-objective production scheduling problems using metaheuristics

Performance of the MOSA Method for the Bicriteria Assignment Problem

On iterative algorithms for linear least squares problems with bound constraints