D
Darian M. Ibrahim
Researcher at College of William & Mary
Publications - 42
Citations - 452
Darian M. Ibrahim is an academic researcher from College of William & Mary. The author has contributed to research in topics: Venture capital & Entrepreneurship. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 40 publications receiving 430 citations. Previous affiliations of Darian M. Ibrahim include University of Wisconsin-Madison & Washington University in St. Louis.
Papers
More filters
Posted Content
The (Not So) Puzzling Behavior of Angel Investors
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explain the recent move toward venture capital-like contracts as angel investing becomes more of a professional endeavor, and also explain why traditional angel investment contracts employ none of these measures, which appears inconsistent with what financial contracting theory would predict.
Journal Article
The (Not So) Puzzling Behavior of Angel Investors
TL;DR: Angel investors fund start-ups in their earliest stages, which creates a contracting environment rife with uncertainty, information asymmetry, and agency costs in the form of potential opportunism by entrepreneurs.
Journal ArticleDOI
Equity Crowdfunding: A Market for Lemons?
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine online investing both descriptively and normatively by tackling Titles II and III of the JOBS Act of 2012 and argue that there are good reasons why Title III could attract high-quality participants as well.
Journal ArticleDOI
Debt as Venture Capital
TL;DR: This article used interview data and theoretical contributions from finance, economics, and law to solve the puzzle of venture debt by revealing that a start-up's VC backing and intellectual property substitute for traditional loan repayment criteria and make venture debt attractive to a specialized set of lenders.
Posted Content
Reduce, Refine, Replace: The Failure of the Three R's and the Future of Animal Experimentation
TL;DR: This article takes a systematic and critical look at the Three R's and concludes that they are ineffective in preventing unnecessary animal suffering even if animal experimentation is generally regarded as legitimate.