scispace - formally typeset
D

Darian Unger

Researcher at Howard University

Publications -  6
Citations -  287

Darian Unger is an academic researcher from Howard University. The author has contributed to research in topics: New product development & Iterative design. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 6 publications receiving 263 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Improving product development process design: a method for managing information flows, risks, and iterations

TL;DR: In this paper, a method with which a company can design a product development process (PDP) applicable to its unique circumstance is presented. And the authors demonstrate how one company is using it to redesign its PDP.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparing product development processes and managing risk

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate the relationship between product development risk and product development process (PDP) management and propose several iteration-and review-based metrics by which PDPs can be effectively identified and compared.
Journal ArticleDOI

E-cigarettes/electronic nicotine delivery systems: a word of caution on health and new product development

TL;DR: The effects and use of ENDS are described, with studies to date indicating that, despite differences in toxicity, there is insufficient evidence that ENDS leads to smoking cessation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Modern innovation management theory and the evolving US lighting industry

TL;DR: In this article, a series of disruptive innovations in the 150-year history of the US lighting industry is used to test whether two key innovation management theories retain their explanatory power as market structures change.
Journal ArticleDOI

Business Education Innovation: How Common Exams Can Improve University Teaching.

TL;DR: This article proposed instructor-designed common examinations as an incentive for teaching improvement and used empirical data from business school student tests to illustrate the utility of such assessments, comparing the data from a common assessment revealed important differences about what students learn and created opportunities and incentives to improve teaching practices in a way few other methods can.