scispace - formally typeset
D

Dave Singelée

Researcher at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Publications -  67
Citations -  1612

Dave Singelée is an academic researcher from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. The author has contributed to research in topics: Authentication & Wireless. The author has an hindex of 20, co-authored 61 publications receiving 1421 citations. Previous affiliations of Dave Singelée include Catholic University of Leuven & IMEC.

Papers
More filters

CANAuth - A Simple, Backward Compatible Broadcast Authentication Protocol for CAN bus

TL;DR: This paper investigates the problems associated with implementing a backward compatible message authentication Protocol, CANAuth, and presents a message authentication protocol that meets all of the requirements set forth and does not violate any constraint of the CAN bus.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Location verification using secure distance bounding protocols

TL;DR: This paper explains how to modify the distance bounding protocol to make it resistant to a so-called "terrorist fraud attack" and discusses the properties of these protocols.
Book ChapterDOI

Distance bounding in noisy environments

TL;DR: An improved distance bounding protocol for noisy channels that offers a substantial reduction in the number of communication rounds compared to the Hancke and Kuhn protocol and uses binary codes to correct bit errors occurring during the fast bit exchanges.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Low-cost untraceable authentication protocols for RFID

TL;DR: This paper addresses the risk of tracking attacks in RFID networks by repairing three revised EC-RAC protocols and presenting the search protocol, a novel scheme which allows for privately querying a particular tag, and proof its security properties.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Physical-layer fingerprinting of LoRa devices using supervised and zero-shot learning

TL;DR: This paper proposes and analyses a novel methodology to fingerprint LoRa devices, which is inspired by recent advances in supervised machine learning and zero-shot image classification, and shows that identical chipsets can be distinguished with 59% to 99% accuracy per symbol, whereas chipsets from different vendors can be fingerprinted with 99% to 100% accuracy.