D
David DeMatteo
Researcher at Drexel University
Publications - 135
Citations - 3477
David DeMatteo is an academic researcher from Drexel University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Recidivism & Forensic psychology. The author has an hindex of 27, co-authored 126 publications receiving 3238 citations. Previous affiliations of David DeMatteo include University of Pennsylvania & Villanova University.
Papers
More filters
Book
Essentials of research design and methodology
TL;DR: This work focuses on the development of a strategy for controlling Artifact and Bias in research and on the design and methodology of such a strategy.
Journal ArticleDOI
Principles of forensic mental health assessment: implications for neuropsychological assessment in forensic contexts.
Kirk Heilbrun,Geoffrey Marczyk,David DeMatteo,Eric A. Zillmer,Justin Harris,Tiffany Jennings +5 more
TL;DR: In this paper, an adaptation of 29 recently derived principles of FMHA (Heilbrun, 2001) that have been described in two forms: general guidelines for application in FMHA, and guidelines for applying to neuropsychological assessment in forensic contexts is described.
Journal ArticleDOI
Do research payments precipitate drug use or coerce participation
David S. Festinger,Douglas B. Marlowe,Jason R. Croft,Karen L. Dugosh,Nicole K. Mastro,Patricia A. Lee,David DeMatteo,Nicholas S. Patapis +7 more
TL;DR: It is suggested that higher magnitude payments may be more cost-effective by reducing the need for more intensive follow-up efforts and consistent with the contingency management literature, higher payments and cash payments were associated with increased follow- up rates.
Journal ArticleDOI
The role and relevance of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in court: A case law survey of U.S. courts (1991-2004).
David DeMatteo,John F. Edens +1 more
TL;DR: The use of the psychopathy checklist-Revised (PCL-R; R. D. Hare, 1991, 2003) in criminal and sexually violent predator (SVP) cases has been studied in this article.
Journal ArticleDOI
How "specific" are gender-specific rehabilitation needs? An empirical analysis.
TL;DR: Female offenders received significantly higher ratings in companion and financial deficits, consistent with some prior research suggesting that social and financial risk factors for offending may be more substantial in women.