scispace - formally typeset
D

David J. Hallford

Researcher at Deakin University

Publications -  76
Citations -  1605

David J. Hallford is an academic researcher from Deakin University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Autobiographical memory & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 59 publications receiving 1011 citations. Previous affiliations of David J. Hallford include Australian Catholic University & Federation University Australia.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review

TL;DR: Findings are discussed in terms of the trends indicated by the data, which provided substantiation that sexting behaviour is associated with numerous behavioural, psychological, and social factors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Psychopathology and episodic future thinking: A systematic review and meta-analysis of specificity and episodic detail.

TL;DR: A systematic review comparing psychiatric groups with control groups on the specificity and episodic detail of EFT indicated individuals with a psychiatric diagnosis have significantly less specific and detailed EFT.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sexting and Psychological Distress: The Role of Unwanted and Coerced Sexts

TL;DR: Re receiving unwanted sexts, or sexting under coercion, was associated with higher depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms, and lower self-esteem, and these two sexted experiences were independent predictors of psychological distress.
Journal ArticleDOI

Psychopathology in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence.

TL;DR: This review and meta-analysis is the first to provide prevalence estimates of psychological disorders in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder and significant heterogeneity was detected in these categories.
Journal ArticleDOI

The dark side of sexting – factors predicting the dissemination of sexts

TL;DR: Four unique predictors of increased likelihood of non-consensual dissemination are found: being sexually active, having received a disseminated sext, more strongly normalising that sexts are usually disseminated or seen by others, and stronger positive attitudes towards disseminatingsexts as being funny; and one unique predictor of decreased likelihood: having personally-experienced negative consequences from sending sxts.