Showing papers by "David Neary published in 2001"

Distinct behavioural profiles in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia

Abstract: OBJECTIVE To test predictions that frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia give rise to distinct patterns of behavioural change. METHODS An informant based semistructured behavioural interview, covering the domains of basic and social emotions, social and personal behaviour, sensory behaviour, eating and oral behaviour, repetitive behaviours, rituals, and compulsions, was administered to carers of 41 patients with semantic dementia and with apathetic (FTD-A) and disinhibited (FTD-D) forms of frontotemporal dementia. RESULTS Consistent with prediction, emotional changes differentiated FTD from semantic dementia. Whereas lack of emotional response was pervasive in FTD, it was more selective in semantic dementia, affecting particularly the capacity to show fear. Social avoidance occurred more often in FTD and social seeking in semantic dementia. Patients with FTD showed reduced response to pain, whereas patients with semantic dementia more often showed exaggerated reactions to sensory stimuli. Gluttony and indiscriminate eating were characteristic of FTD, whereas patients with semantic dementia were more likely to exhibit food fads. Hyperorality, involving inedible objects, was unrelated to gluttony, indicating different underlying mechanisms. Repetitive behaviours were common in both FTD and semantic dementia, but had a more compulsive quality in semantic dementia. Behavioural differences were greater between semantic dementia and FTD-A than FTD-D. A logistic regression analysis indicated that emotional and repetitive, compulsive behaviours discriminated FTD from semantic dementia with 97% accuracy. CONCLUSION The findings confirm predictions regarding behavioural differences in frontotemporal and semantic dementia and point to differential roles of the frontal and temporal lobes in affect, social functioning, eating, and compulsive behaviour.

Behaviour in frontotemporal dementia, Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia

Abstract: Objectives– The study aimed to increase understanding of behavioural changes in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and identify features that best differentiate FTD from Alzheimer's disease (AD) and cerebrovascular dementia (CvD). Methods– A semi-structured questionnaire was administered to carers of 30 FTD, 75 AD and 34 CvD patients. Results– Behavioural changes that strongly discriminated FTD from AD and to a lesser extent CvD were loss of emotions and insight, selfishness, disinhibition, personal neglect, gluttony and sweet food preference, wandering, motor and verbal stereotypies, loss of pain, echolalia and mutism. Irritability, hyposexuality and hypersomnia did not discriminate. Emotional, eating and stereotyped behaviours correctly classified 95% of patients using regression analysis. Conclusions– Behavioural characteristics accurately differentiate FTD from AD and CvD. The findings highlight the particular importance of affective change in FTD, and underline the role of the frontotemporal lobes in emotion.

Longitudinal evaluation of cognitive disorder in Huntington's disease.

Abstract: The study investigated longitudinal change in cognitive function in 87 patients with Huntington's disease (HD), using a range of neuropsychological tests, which tap mental manipulative abilities, memory, and frontal executive skills. Over a 1-year period the largest changes were noted in letter fluency, object recall, and Stroop Test performance, whereas no changes were noted over more than 3 years on the modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Contrary to expectation, greater change was evident over 1 year for tasks with low compared to high cognitive demands. The differential sensitivity of tasks was attributed in part to inherent characteristics of the tests themselves: their capacity to detect minor gradations of change and their vulnerability to practice effects. However, the greater change for relatively automatic, speed-based tasks with low cognitive demands was interpreted as reflecting the evolution of HD, with a greater magnitude of change occurring in basal ganglia than cortical function. One purpose of the study was to identify tasks sensitive to the progression of HD and hence most suitable for the evaluation of therapies. Despite reaching statistical significance by virtue of the large group size, numerical differences in test scores over 1 year were very small, suggesting that the use of such tests to evaluate change in individuals or small groups of subjects would be problematic. The data highlight the slow progression of HD, the limitations of standard cognitive tests in detecting change over short periods, and the need for therapeutic studies that encompass a relatively prolonged time frame.