D
David Warden
Researcher at University of Strathclyde
Publications - 29
Citations - 1711
David Warden is an academic researcher from University of Strathclyde. The author has contributed to research in topics: Prosocial behavior & Coping (psychology). The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 29 publications receiving 1615 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Prosocial children, bullies and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and social problem-solving strategies
David Warden,Suzanne MacKinnon +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated links between children's social behaviour and their sociometric status, empathy and social problem-solving strategies, and found that prosocial children were significantly more popular than the other role groups, and bully-victims were most frequently rejected by their peers.
Journal ArticleDOI
Help seeking amongst child and adolescent victims of peer-aggression and bullying: the influence of school-stage, gender, victimisation, appraisal, and emotion
TL;DR: Results suggest that pupils are more willing to seek help when they see the situation as one in which something can be achieved, and this may need to be emphasized to teachers.
Journal ArticleDOI
Perceived discrimination and psychological distress: the role of personal and ethnic self-esteem
TL;DR: The authors examined the relationship between perceived ethnic discrimination and psychological distress in a sample of ethnic minority young people (N=154) and found no support for the hypothesis derived from the self-esteem theory of depression that selfesteem (personal and ethnic) moderates the discrimination-distress relationship.
Journal ArticleDOI
Perceptions and correlates of peer-victimization and bullying.
TL;DR: Peer-victimization and bullying appear to be qualitatively different experiences for children and adolescents, with bullying being the more serious phenomenon.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Influence of Context on Children's Use of Identifying Expressions and References.
TL;DR: This paper found that children under five years fail to take account of their audience's knowledge of a referent and their referring expressions are predominantly definite, while children between five and nine years consistently introduce referents with indefinite expressions.