D
Deryn Strange
Researcher at John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Publications - 55
Citations - 1074
Deryn Strange is an academic researcher from John Jay College of Criminal Justice. The author has contributed to research in topics: False memory & Suspect. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 55 publications receiving 848 citations. Previous affiliations of Deryn Strange include Victoria University of Wellington & University of Otago.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
A mega-analysis of memory reports from eight peer-reviewed false memory implantation studies
Alan Scoboria,Kimberley A. Wade,D. Stephen Lindsay,Tanjeem Azad,Deryn Strange,James Ost,Ira E. Hyman +6 more
TL;DR: This research demonstrates a useful procedure for systematically combining data that are not amenable to meta-analysis, and provides the most valid estimate of false memory formation and associated moderating factors within the implantation literature to date.
Journal ArticleDOI
Self-report may underestimate trauma intrusions.
TL;DR: The data suggest people may lack meta-awareness of trauma-related thoughts, which has implications for theory, research and treatment relating to trauma- related psychopathology.
Journal ArticleDOI
Unfair Lineups Make Witnesses More Likely to Confuse Innocent and Guilty Suspects.
TL;DR: This work compared three fair-lineup techniques used by the police with unfair lineups in which the authors did nothing to prevent distinctive suspects from standing out, and found doing nothing not only increased subjects' willingness to identify the suspect but also markedly impaired subjects’ ability to distinguish between innocent and guilty suspects.
Journal ArticleDOI
Beliefs about alibis and alibi investigations: a survey of law enforcement
Jennifer E. Dysart,Deryn Strange +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the majority of published research on alibis has focused on jurors' perceptions of alibi believability, and it is often law enforcement officers and prosecutors who...
Journal ArticleDOI
Event plausibility does not determine children's false memories
TL;DR: Across age groups, younger children developed more false memories than older children, and within each age group, the rate of false memories was the same for each event.