D
Donald D. Searing
Researcher at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Publications - 35
Citations - 2209
Donald D. Searing is an academic researcher from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The author has contributed to research in topics: Politics & Citizenship. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 35 publications receiving 2107 citations. Previous affiliations of Donald D. Searing include Washington University in St. Louis.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The deliberative potential of political discussion
TL;DR: The authors found that political discussion is infrequently public, modestly contested and sometimes marred by inequality, and that the factors inhibiting more deliberative discussions should be amenable to some change, particularly through education.
Book
Westminster’s World: Understanding Political Roles
TL;DR: The roles, rules, and rationality of parliament coding preference roles are discussed in detail in this article, where the authors interview members of parliament to understand the roles and roles of parliament men.
Journal ArticleDOI
Westminster's World: Understanding Political Roles.
TL;DR: The roles, rules, and rationality of parliament coding preference roles are discussed in detail in this article, where the authors interview members of parliament to understand the roles and roles of parliament men.
Journal ArticleDOI
Roles, Rules, and Rationality in the New Institutionalism
TL;DR: The authors showed how motivational role theory can be used to examine the impact of goals and incentives upon behavior and thereby integrate economic and sociological perspectives, and argued that the most promising framework for the new institutionalism is one that incorporates not just formal but also informal institutional structures (like roles and norms), a framework that incorporates, rather than excludes, political behavior.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Nature of Citizenship in the United States and Great Britain: Empirical Comments on Theoretical Themes
TL;DR: This article examined citizens' conceptions of rights, duties, and civic identities in the United States and Great Britain by combining an information processing approach with a methodology that has seldom been used in political science.