scispace - formally typeset
D

Duncan Wigan

Researcher at Copenhagen Business School

Publications -  37
Citations -  925

Duncan Wigan is an academic researcher from Copenhagen Business School. The author has contributed to research in topics: International political economy & Corporate governance. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 36 publications receiving 786 citations. Previous affiliations of Duncan Wigan include University of Sussex.

Papers
More filters

The Governance of Global Wealth Chains

TL;DR: In this article, a theoretical framework is proposed to explain how Global Wealth Chains (GWCs) are created, maintained, and governed, and five types of GWC governance are differentiated: Market, Modular, Relational, Captive, and Hierarchy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Powering ideas through expertise: professionals in global tax battles

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that professionals can contest the established order when demonstrations of expertise can be fused with claims to moral authority, and demonstrate that such a constellation is more likely when political conditions are...
Journal ArticleDOI

The governance of global wealth chains

TL;DR: In this paper, a theoretical framework is proposed to explain how Global Wealth Chains (GWCs) are created, maintained, and governed, and five types of GWC governance are differentiated: Market, Modular, Relational, Captive, and Hierarchy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Capital Unchained: Finance, Intangible Assets and the Double Life of Capital in the Offshore World

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore the longer term implications of accumulation of internationalised capital in intangible and abstract forms, and the prominent role of finance and offshore in giving mobility and fluidity to these forms of capital.
Journal ArticleDOI

Financialisation and Derivatives: Constructing an Artifice of Indifference

TL;DR: In this paper, a central role for derivatives in defining the character and dynamics of financialised accumulation is discussed, where ownership can take a form wherein there are no direct ties to a particular asset, and therefore no possibility of a conceptual link between property and stewardship.