Seventy five years ago, three remarkable papers by Schr¨ odinger, Kennard and Darwin were published. They were devoted to the evolution of Gaussian wave packets for an oscillator, a free particle and a particle moving in uniform constant electric and magnetic fields. From the contemporary point of view, these packets can be considered as prototypes of the coherent and squeezed states, which are, in a sense, the cornerstones of modern quantum optics. Moreover, these states are frequently used in many other areas, from solid state physics to cosmology. This paper gives a review of studies performed in the field of so-called ‘nonclassical states’ (squeezed states are their simplest representatives) over the past seventy five years, both in quantum optics and in other branches of quantum physics. My starting point is to elucidate who introduced different concepts, notions and terms, when, and what were the initial motivations of the authors. Many new references have been found which enlarge the ‘standard citation package’ used by some authors, recovering many undeservedly forgotten (or unnoticed) papers and names. Since it is practically impossible to cite several thousand publications, I have tried to include mainly references to papers introducing new types of quantum states and studying their properties, omitting many publications devoted to applications and to the methods of generation and experimental schemes, which can be found in other well known reviews. I also mainly concentrate on the initial period, which terminated approximately at the border between the end of the 1980s and the beginning of the 1990s, when several fundamental experiments on the generation of squeezed states were performed and the first conferences devoted to squeezed and ‘nonclassical’ states commenced. The 1990s are described in a more ‘squeezed’ manner: I have confined myself to references to papers where some new concepts have been introduced, and to the most recent reviews or papers with extensive bibliographical lists.

/pdf/nonclassical-states-in-quantum-optics-a-squeezed-review-of-1899ims4cu.pdf

'Nonclassical' states in quantum optics: a 'squeezed' review of the first 75 years

The usual mathematical model of the single-mode electromagnetic field is the harmonic oscillator with an infinite-dimensional state space, which unfortunately cannot accommodate the existence of a Hermitian phase operator. Recently we indicated that this difficulty may be circumvented by using an alternative, and physically indistinguishable, mathematical model of the single-mode field involving a finite but arbitrarily large state space, the dimension of which is allowed to tend to infinity after physically measurable results, such as expectation values, are calculated. In this paper we investigate the properties of a Hermitian phase operator which follows directly and uniquely from the form of the phase states in this space and find them to be well behaved. The phase-number commutator is not subject to the difficulties inherent in Dirac's original commutator, but still preserves the commutator--Poisson-bracket correspondence for physical field states. In the quantum regime of small field strengths, the phase operator predicts phase properties substantially different from those obtained using the conventional Susskind-Glogower operators. In particular, our results are consistent with the vacuum being a state of random phase and the phases of two vacuum fields being uncorrelated. For higher-intensity fields, the quantum phase properties agree with those previously obtained by phenomenological and semiclassical approaches, where such approximations are valid. We illustrate the properties of the phase with a discussion of partial phase states. The Hermitian phase operator also allows us to construct a unitary number-shift operator and phase-moment generating functions. We conclude that the alternative mathematical description of the single-mode field presented here provides a valid, and potentially useful, quantum-mechanical approach for calculating the phase properties of the electromagnetic field.

Phase properties of the quantized single-mode electromagnetic field.

We examine the problem of determining the phase difference between two optical fields, first for classical and later for quantum fields, by reference to two simple measurement schemes that yield the sine and/or cosine of the phase difference between classical fields. We show that certain difficulties exist even within the framework of semiclassical radiation theory when the field is very weak, and particularly when amplitude and phase fluctuations are correlated. We find that a clear distinction has to be made between the measured values of the sine or cosine and the values that can be inferred from a series of repeated measurements. A corresponding distinction can be made also for a quantum field, although the interpretation is not the same. The dynamical variables chosen to represent the cosine and sine that emerge from the discussion of the measurement schemes commute when the sine and cosine are obtained together, but not when the measurement yields one or the other. These sine and cosine operators have well-defined values only when there is a large dispersion of the photon number. We arrive at expressions for the moments of the measured and of the inferred sines and cosines that differ from most previous treatments. The expressions are applied to optical fields in several different quantum states. Only for the Fock state and for the so-called phase state, which was treated recently at some length by Pegg and Barnett [Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)], do the measured and the inferred moments coincide. Our analysis of the problem of phase measurement leads to the conclusion that the appropriate dynamical variables for the measured sine and cosine depend on the measurement scheme, and that different schemes correspond to different operators.

Operational approach to the phase of a quantum field

Dirac's prescription for quantisation does not lead to a unique phase operator for the electromagnetic field. The authors consider the commonly employed phase operators due to Susskind and Glogower (1964) and their extension to unitary exponential phase operators. However, they find that phase measuring experiments respond to a different operator. They discuss the form of the measured phase operator and its properties.

http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0305-4470/19/18/030/pdf

Phase in quantum optics

We introduce a unitary operator representing the exponential of the phase difference between two modes of the electromagnetic field. The eigenvalue spectrum has a discrete character that is fully analyzed. We relate this operator with a suitable polar decomposition of the Stokes parameters of the field, obtaining a natural classical limit. The cases of weakly and highly excited states are considered, discussing to what extent it is possible to talk about the phase for a single-mode field. This operator is applied to some interesting two-mode fields.

/pdf/phase-difference-operator-3m41d351on.pdf

E. C. Lerner

Papers

Harmonic-oscillator phase operators