Background: With over 37.8 million cases and over 1 million deaths worldwide, the COVID-19 pandemic has created a societal and economic upheaval of unparalleled magnitude. A positive transformation has been brought about by innovative solutions in the health care sector that aim to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on human health. For instance, the use of telehealth has been on the rise amidst this public health emergency.
Objective: Given the unprecedented scale of the pandemic with no definitive endpoint, we aimed to scope the existing telehealth-related literature during a defined period of the ongoing pandemic (ie, January to June 2020).
Methods: Our scoping review was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer Manual. We systematically searched PubMed and Embase databases with specific eligibility criteria. Data extracted from the shortlisted articles included first author and affiliation, journal title, publication type, terminologies used to describe telehealth and their accompanying definitions, health discipline or medical specialties and subspecialties wherein telehealth had been applied, the purpose of telehealth use, and the authors’ overall sentiment on telehealth use. We collated the available information and used descriptive statistics to analyze the synthesized data.
Results: In all, 543 articles published across 331 different journals were included in this scoping review. The Journal of Medical Internet Research and its sister journals featured the highest number of articles (25/543, 4.6%). Nearly all (533/543, 98.2%) articles were in English. The majority of the articles were opinions, commentaries, and perspectives (333/543, 61.3%). Most authors of the articles reviewed were from high-income countries (470/543, 86.6%), especially from the United States of America (237/543, 43.6%). In all, 39 different definitions were used to describe terms equivalent to telehealth. A small percentage (42/543, 7.7%) of the articles focused on the provision of COVID-19–related care. Moreover, 49.7% (270/543) of the articles primarily focused on the provision of multiple components of clinical care, and 23% (125/543) of the articles focused on various specialties and subspecialties of internal medicine. For a vast majority (461/543, 84.9%) of the articles, the authors expressed a celebratory sentiment about the use of telehealth.
Conclusions: This review identified considerable emerging literature on telehealth during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic, albeit mostly from high-income countries. There is compelling evidence to suggest that telehealth may have a significant effect on advancing health care in the future. However, the feasibility and application of telehealth in resource-limited settings and low- and middle-income countries must be established to avail its potential and transform health care for the world’s population. Given the rapidity with which telehealth is advancing, a global consensus on definitions, boundaries, protocols, monitoring, evaluation, and data privacy is urgently needed.

/pdf/use-of-telehealth-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-scoping-tt6smybjy7.pdf

Use of Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.

Objectives:Identify and summarize the available literature on the acceleration in the use of telemedicine in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, with an aim to provide justification and guidance fo...

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2150132720980612

Implementation and Usefulness of Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.

Background The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has defined 2020 thus far. Businesses, social and religious gatherings, travel, and almost all forms of transportation shut down to halt the spread of COVID-19. People were ordered to quarantine in place, and the world appears to go into a standstill. In the midst of being quarantined people with acute and chronic conditions still require medical care and treatment. An alternative way for people to receive needed health care was necessary. Hence, we saw an unprecedented surge in telehealth. With this unprecedented surge in use of telehealth, there is matter of delivering quality care. Objective Guided by the Donabedian Model, the purpose of this integrative review was to examine current evidence on patient and healthcare provider's satisfaction with the use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design An integrative review of the literature Data sources The literature review was conducted utilizing PubMED, CINAHL, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library databases. Inclusion criteria were studies published from January 2020 to July 11, 2020, published and translated in English language, and studies that evaluated patients and providers satisfaction with the use of telehealth or telemedicine during COVID-19. Eighteen articles were included in this review. Review methods An evaluation matrix was developed to collect data from the included articles. The articles were appraised using Fineout-Overholt & Gallagher-Ford Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist for Descriptive Studies and Rapid Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation or Quality Improvement Projects (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015). Authors independently appraised each article using the appropriate appraisal tools. Results Ten of the articles (53%) included were studies conducted in the United States. Sixteen out of 18 studies evaluated patient satisfaction and five studies examined healthcare providers’ satisfaction with the use of telehealth. The majority of telehealth services offered were by subspecialists. Overall, patients and healthcare providers have high level of satisfaction with the use of telehealth during COVID-19 pandemic. Many patients and healthcare providers reported willingness to continue using telehealth after the pandemic. Conclusion This integrative review provided additional evidence on patient and healthcare provider's satisfaction with the use of telehealth. Findings in this review may not be surprising as individuals, healthcare providers, and health systems needed to adopt the use telehealth due to necessity. However, the results for telehealth are promising.

Satisfaction with the use of telehealth during COVID-19: An integrative review.

Background The field of telemedicine has grown tremendously over the last decade. We present a systematic review of publications on telemedicine as it pertains to surgery, addressing six facets: 1) telerobotics, 2) telementoring, 3) teleconsulting, 4) telemedicine in post-operative follow-up, 5) tele-education, and 6) current technology. Data sources A search of relevant literature querying PubMed, Web of Science, and Science Direct was performed using the following keywords: telecommunication, telemedicine, telehealth, virtual health, virtual medicine, general surgery, surgery, surgical or surgical patients. Conclusions Telemedicine is being used to care for patients in remote areas, to help expert surgeons assist other specialists in the office or novice surgeons in the operating room, as well as to help teach the next generation of surgeons. There are many opportunities for surgeons to utilize this technology to optimize their practice.

Telemedicine and telementoring in the surgical specialties: A narrative review.

Telehealth utilization during the Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review.

Background In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a rapid increase in telemedicine visits. Otolaryngology patient satisfaction with these visits has not yet been extensively studied using a validated survey. Methods All patients who had telemedicine visits with three head and neck surgeons, by phone or video-based platform, between March 25, 2020 and April 24, 2020. Retrospective chart reviews were conducted to determine demographic, disease, and treatment information. Patients who had a video visit were contacted by telephone and, if they could be reached and consented, were administered the telehealth usability questionnaire (TUQ). Results Hundred surveys were completed. The average score across all questions was 6.01 on a scale from 1 to 7, where 7 indicated the highest level of patient agreement. The highest scores were for questions related to satisfaction with telehealth (6.29), while the lowest were related to reliability (4.86). Conclusions Patients are generally highly satisfied with telemedicine.

/pdf/telemedicine-for-head-and-neck-ambulatory-visits-during-1ir1fk1l5z.pdf

Telemedicine for head and neck ambulatory visits during COVID-19: Evaluating usability and patient satisfaction.

ObjectiveDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been unprecedented use of telemedicine for otolaryngology ambulatory visits. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine is an important metric, but surv...

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0194599820943523

Patient Perceptions of Head and Neck Ambulatory Telemedicine Visits: A Qualitative Study.

Update on MRI findings of osteomyelitis of long bones in the adult population

Background Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of disability in young adults. Recurrent TBI is associated with a range of neurologic sequelae, but the contributing factors behind the development of such chronic encephalopathy are poorly understood. Purpose To quantify early amyloid β deposition in the brain of otherwise healthy adult men exposed to repeated subconcussive blast injury using amyloid PET. Materials and Methods In this prospective study from January 2020 to December 2021, military instructors who were routinely exposed to repeated blast events were evaluated at two different points: baseline (before blast exposure from breacher or grenade) and approximately 5 months after baseline (after blast exposure). Age-matched healthy control participants not exposed to blasts and without a history of brain injury were evaluated at similar two points. Neurocognitive evaluation was performed with standard neuropsychologic testing in both groups. Analysis of PET data consisted of standardized uptake value measurements in six relevant brain regions and a whole-brain voxel-based statistical approach. Results Participants were men (nine control participants [median age, 33 years; IQR, 32-36 years] and nine blast-exposed participants [median age, 33 years; IQR, 30-34 years]; P = .82). In the blast-exposed participants, four brain regions showed significantly increased amyloid deposition after blast exposure: inferomedial frontal lobe (P = .004), precuneus (P = .02), anterior cingulum (P = .002), and superior parietal lobule (P = .003). No amyloid deposition was observed in the control participants. Discriminant analysis on the basis of regional changes of amyloid accumulation correctly classified the nine healthy control participants as healthy control participants (100%), and seven of the nine blast-exposed participants (78%) were correctly classified as blast exposed. Based on the voxel-based analysis, whole-brain parametric maps of early abnormal early amyloid uptake were obtained. Conclusion Early brain amyloid accumulation was identified and quantified at PET in otherwise healthy adult men exposed to repetitive subconcussive traumatic events. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Haller in this issue.

Early Brain Amyloid Accumulation at PET in Military Instructors Exposed to Subconcussive Blast Injuries.

Objective To identify and characterize the impact of anticholinergic medications, which have known adverse effects on cognition in older adults, on speech perception after cochlear implantation. Study Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Tertiary referral center. Subject Population Adult patients who underwent cochlear implantation between January 2010 and September 2020 with speech perception scores at 3, 6, and 12 months. Interventions Anticholinergic burden of patients' prescribed medications. Main Outcome Measures AzBio speech perception scores after implantation. Results One hundred twenty-six patients had documented AzBio in quiet speech perception score at all three postactivation time points. Patients were divided into three groups by anticholinergic burden (ACB) score, including ACB = 0 (90 patients), 1 (23 patients), and ≥2 (13 patients). There was no statistically significant difference between ACB groups in audiologic performance at candidacy testing (p = 0.77) or at 3 months after implantation (p = 0.13). Beginning at 6 months, a lower mean AzBio was seen in patients with higher ACB scores (68% ACB = 0; 62% ACB = 1; 48.1% ACB ≥ 2; p = 0.03). At 12 months, there were further differences between the groups (71.0% ACB = 0, 69.5% ACB = 1, 48.0% ACB ≥2, p < 0.01). Controlling for the effects of age using multivariate linear regression showed persistent effects of ACB score on learning-related AzBio improvements. Comparatively, the negative impact of a single ACB score point was equivalent to nearly 10 years of aging (p = 0.03). Conclusions Increased ACB is associated with worse speech perception scores after cochlear implantation, an effect that persists even when accounting for patient age, suggesting that these medications may have cognitive and learning effects that reduce cochlear implant performance.

Eleanor Layfield

Papers

Telemedicine for head and neck ambulatory visits during COVID-19: Evaluating usability and patient satisfaction.

Patient Perceptions of Head and Neck Ambulatory Telemedicine Visits: A Qualitative Study.

Update on MRI findings of osteomyelitis of long bones in the adult population

Early Brain Amyloid Accumulation at PET in Military Instructors Exposed to Subconcussive Blast Injuries.

Impact of Anticholinergic Medications on Speech Perception Performance after Cochlear Implantation