Economics Of Discrimination

Social Justice and the City

Women and human development: the capabilities approach

London: Aspects of Change

Walking the talk.

This methodological paper shows that using different local job accessibility models (LJAs) leads to significantly different empirical appreciations of job accessibility. Matching several exhaustive micro data sources on the Paris region municipalities, the paper benchmarks a representative set of LJA measurement models used in the recent literature and an original model where job availability is fully estimated according to a set of individual characteristics, job competition is fully modelled on the local labour market and frontier effects are controlled for. We show that the model-induced empirical differences are spatially differentiated across the Paris region municipalities, and that failing to fully estimate job availability may lead to overestimation of the job accessibility levels of underprivileged municipalities.

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00867924/document

Key issues in local job accessibility measurement: : different models mean different results

This paper advocates, from a normative point of view, the use of multidimensional, capabilist-based urban indicators and shows that they can shed a new empirical light on socio-spatial differentiation in cities. First, the relevance is discussed of Amartya Sen’s capability approach when assessing well-being from an urban, spatialised point of view, and a definition is proposed of a capabilist spatialised well-being indicator (CaS). After presenting the main methodological issues of its operationalisation, an example is presented of an empirical specification based on French data for the Paris region. It is shown that using CaS, instead of more traditional, income-based measures, helps to uncover interesting trends in socio-spatial differentiation in the Paris Region between 1999 and 2006. In particular, even if there was a well-being ‘catching up’ phenomenon between municipalities, a cluster of the least-advantaged municipalities in the Paris region seems to be drifting away in terms of well-being.

Well-being Disparities within the Paris Region: A Capabilist Spatialised Outlook

Quel périmètre pour la différenciation sociale de l’espace urbain ? Une proposition capabiliste

Key Issues in Local Job Accessibility Measurement: Different Models Mean Different Results

This paper advocates, from a normative point of view, the use of multidimensional, capabilist-based urban indicators and shows that they can shed a new empirical light on socio-spatial differentiation in cities. First, the relevance is discussed of Amartya Sen's capability approach when assessing well-being from an urban, spatialised point of view, and a definition is proposed of a capabilist spatialised well-being indicator (CaS). After presenting the main methodological issues of its operationalisation, an example is presented of an empirical specification based on French data for the Paris region. It is shown that using CaS, instead of more traditional, income-based measures, helps to uncover interesting trends in socio-spatial differentiation in the Paris Region between 1999 and 2006. In particular, even if there was a well-being 'catching up' phenomenon between municipalities, a cluster of the least-advantaged municipalities in the Paris region seems to be drifting away in terms of well-being.

Elisabeth Tovar

Papers

Key issues in local job accessibility measurement: : different models mean different results

Well-being Disparities within the Paris Region: A Capabilist Spatialised Outlook

Quel périmètre pour la différenciation sociale de l’espace urbain ? Une proposition capabiliste

Key Issues in Local Job Accessibility Measurement: Different Models Mean Different Results

Well-being Disparities within the Paris Region: A Capabilist Spatialised Outlook