scispace - formally typeset
E

Elizabeth Cosgrave

Researcher at University of Melbourne

Publications -  33
Citations -  5185

Elizabeth Cosgrave is an academic researcher from University of Melbourne. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Mental health. The author has an hindex of 20, co-authored 33 publications receiving 4773 citations. Previous affiliations of Elizabeth Cosgrave include Mental Health Services.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Mapping the onset of psychosis: the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States

TL;DR: The CAARMS instrument provides a useful platform for monitoring sub threshold psychotic symptoms for worsening into full-threshold psychotic disorder and has good to excellent reliability.
Journal ArticleDOI

Randomized controlled trial of interventions designed to reduce the risk of progression to first-episode psychosis in a clinical sample with subthreshold symptoms.

TL;DR: More specific pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy reduces the risk of early transition to psychosis in young people at ultra-high risk, although their relative contributions could not be determined.
Journal ArticleDOI

Psychotic-Like Experiences in a Community Sample of Adolescents: Implications for the Continuum Model of Psychosis and Prediction of Schizophrenia

TL;DR: It is suggested that infrequent psychotic-like experiences are unlikely to be a specific risk factor for onset of a psychotic disorder in community samples, and may represent expressions of underlying vulnerability to psychotic disorder, but Magical Thinking may be a normal personality variant.
Journal ArticleDOI

Validation of "prodromal" criteria to detect individuals at ultra high risk of psychosis: 2 year follow-up.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors assessed the predictive validity of the UHR criteria in a clinical population and found that the criteria significantly predicted onset of psychotic disorder within 2 years, and the transition rate was much lower than in initial cohorts (over 40%).
Journal Article

Validation of "prodromal" criteria to detect individuals at ultra high risk of psychosis: 2 year follow up

TL;DR: Although young help-seekers meeting certain UHR criteria are at greater risk of psychotic disorder than those who do not meet them, caution is needed in their management, since a high transition rate can no longer be assumed.