scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Emilios Christodoulidis published in 2008"


Book
08 Jul 2008
TL;DR: Christodoulidis and Tierney as discussed by the authors re-think the public law and politics debate, rethinking the debate, Emilios Christodoulos and Stephen Tierney and re-considering the monism-pluralism debate.
Abstract: Contents: Public law and politics: rethinking the debate, Emilios Christodoulidis and Stephen Tierney Part 1 On 'The Idea of Public Law': Sovereignty and the idea of public law, Stephen Tierney Authority, exploitation and the idea of public law, Scott Veitch Public law as political jurisprudence: Loughlin's 'idea of public law', Emilios Christodoulidis Reflections on The Idea of Public Law, Martin Loughlin. Part 2 Public Law and Imperialism: On law, democracy and imperialism, James Tully Democracy, political reflexivity and bounded dialogues: reconsidering the monism-pluralism debate, Hans Lindahl The reframing of law's imperial frame: a comment on Tully, Neil Walker Imperialism and constitutionalism, Gavin W. Anderson. Part 3 Public Law and Proceduralism: Constitutionalism as proceduralism: a glance at the terrain, Frank Michelman The crisis of im/purity, Johan van der Walt Between engagement and disengagement: 2 concepts of civility, Ioannis A. Tassopoulos Enabling proceduralism, Victor Tadros Index.

9 citations



01 Jan 2008
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the binding unity in European labour law and the divergence in terms of the competing interests of capital and labour, and address the following questions: In what sense precisely is the articulation of unity and divergence not problematic but instead productive for law? What are the ideological effects of this productivity?
Abstract: This chapter examines European labour law. It focuses on the binding unity in European labour law and the divergence in terms of the competing interests of capital and labour. It addresses the following questions: In what sense precisely is the articulation of unity and divergence not problematic but instead productive for law? What are the ideological effects of this productivity? What strategic use can be made of the articulation — and at what level — of unity and divergence?

2 citations