scispace - formally typeset
E

Ergo Pikas

Researcher at Tallinn University of Technology

Publications -  46
Citations -  1243

Ergo Pikas is an academic researcher from Tallinn University of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Lean construction & Design management. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 42 publications receiving 937 citations. Previous affiliations of Ergo Pikas include Aalto University & Technion – Israel Institute of Technology.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Design management in a design office: Development of the knowledge base

TL;DR: In this second paper in a series of three, the aim is to develop a theoretical knowledge base for design science research (DSR) activity within the next paper by proposing that the proto-theory of design and design rhetoric represent different, yet related dimensions of a productive act (techne).
Journal ArticleDOI

Improving Design Quality by Contractor Involvement: An Empirical Study on Effects

TL;DR: In this article , a case study was used to collect data and content analysis to analyze structural drawings and design meeting minutes of a large-scale infrastructure project, and the focus was on gathering information on the quality of the design and how it was addressed in the design coordination.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality and accuracy of digital twin models for the neighbourhood level building energy performance calculations

TL;DR: In this article , the authors developed a method to extract and enrich initial building geometry information for energy performance calculations from the Estonian national Building Registry (EBR), including also Digital Twin (LOD) geometric models of buildings, and the quality and accuracy of this data is assessed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rhetorical design game for expectation alignment

Mikael Koskela, +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, a design game was formulated around the empirical data by an iterative design process, following established design game theory, and the game was found to more than double the alignment of a group?s individual mental models, though more testing is needed to validate this.