F
Fabio Giron
Researcher at Stony Brook University
Publications - 36
Citations - 1012
Fabio Giron is an academic researcher from Stony Brook University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Carotid endarterectomy & Stroke. The author has an hindex of 20, co-authored 36 publications receiving 987 citations. Previous affiliations of Fabio Giron include Stony Brook University Hospital & State University of New York System.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
High-risk carotid endarterectomy: fact or fiction.
Antonios P. Gasparis,Lise Ricotta,Salvador A. Cuadra,Daniel Char,William Purtill,Paul S. Van Bemmelen,George L. Hines,Fabio Giron,John J. Ricotta +8 more
TL;DR: Although 29% of patients for CEA were high risk as defined by others, it was found no evidence that this influenced the results after CEA, and the concept of the high-risk CEA must be critically reexamined.
Journal ArticleDOI
Renal dysfunction after arteriography.
TL;DR: It is indicated that patients with preexisting renal insufficiency or diabetes mellitus are not at a higher risk for sustaining a fall in creatinine clearance after angiography.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Graft: Three Years' Experience With 362 Grafts
TL;DR: Based on this experience, the PTFE graft seems to be a promising and versatile vascular prosthesis, although it should be used cautiously.
Journal ArticleDOI
Combined coronary artery bypass and carotid endarterectomy: long-term results.
Daniel Char,Salvador A. Cuadra,John J. Ricotta,Thomas V. Bilfinger,Fabio Giron,Allison J. McLarty,Irvin B. Krukenkamp,Adam E. Saltman,Frank C. Seifert +8 more
TL;DR: The large majority of patients with combined coronary and carotid artery disease can be expected to live for greater than 5 yr, therefore, these patients should be considered candidates for prophylactic CAB/CEA for stroke prevention, even when theirCarotid lesions are asymptomatic.
Journal ArticleDOI
Coronary and carotid operations under prospective standardized conditions: incidence and outcome.
TL;DR: A prospective review was undertaken to determine the differences between observed and predicted complication rates, as well as to define new predictors and assess costs in a standardized population of coronary artery bypass grafting patients.