Showing papers by "Federico Lavorini published in 2023"

Chronic Airways Assessment Test: psychometric properties in patients with asthma and/or COPD

Abstract: Abstract Background No short patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments assess overall health status across different obstructive lung diseases. Thus, the wording of the introduction to the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) was modified to permit use in asthma and/or COPD. This tool is called the Chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAAT). Methods The psychometric properties of the CAAT were evaluated using baseline data from the NOVELTY study (NCT02760329) in patients with physician-assigned asthma, asthma + COPD or COPD. Analyses included exploratory/confirmatory factor analyses, differential item functioning and analysis of construct validity. Responses to the CAAT and CAT were compared in patients with asthma + COPD and those with COPD. Results CAAT items were internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha: > 0.7) within each diagnostic group (n = 510). Models for structural and measurement invariance were strong. Tests of differential item functioning showed small differences between asthma and COPD in individual items, but these were not consistent in direction and had minimal overall impact on the total score. The CAAT and CAT were highly consistent when assessed in all NOVELTY patients who completed both (N = 277, Pearson’s correlation coefficient: 0.90). Like the CAT itself, CAAT scores correlated moderately (0.4–0.7) to strongly (> 0.7) with other PRO measures and weakly (< 0.4) with spirometry measures. Conclusions CAAT scores appear to reflect the same health impairment across asthma and COPD, making the CAAT an appropriate PRO instrument for patients with asthma and/or COPD. Its brevity makes it suitable for use in clinical studies and routine clinical practice. Trial registration : NCT02760329.

M4 muscarinic receptors mediate acetylcholine-induced suppressant effects on the cough reflex in the caudal nucleus tractus solitarii of the rabbit.

Abstract: It has been shown that muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) located within the caudal nucleus tractus solitarii (cNTS) mediate a cholinergic inhibitory control mechanism of the cough reflex. Thus, identification of the involved mAChR subtypes could be of considerable interest for novel therapeutic strategies. In pentobarbital sodium-anesthetized, spontaneously breathing rabbits we investigated the contribution of different mAChR subtypes in the modulation of mechanically- and chemically-induced cough reflex. Bilateral microinjections of 1 mM muscarine into the cNTS increased respiratory frequency and decreased expiratory activity even to the complete suppression. Interestingly, muscarine induced strong cough-suppressant effects up to the complete abolition of the reflex. Microinjections of specific mAChR subtype antagonists (M1-M5) into the cNTS were performed. Only microinjections of the M4 antagonist tropicamide (1 mM) prevented muscarine-induced changes in both respiratory activity and cough reflex. The results are discussed in light of the notion that cough involves the activation of the nociceptive system. They also suggest that M4 receptor agonists may have an important role in cough downregulation within the cNTS.

Does thoracoscopic basal pyramid segmentectomy really offer functional advantages in comparison with thoracoscopic lower lobectomy?

Abstract: Abstract OBJECTIVES The functional impact of thoracoscopic basal segmentectomy in comparison with lower lobectomy has not been investigated in-depth and the aim of this study was to clarify this topic. METHODS We retrospectively analysed a cohort of patients who underwent surgery between 2015 and 2019 for non-small-cell lung cancer, peripherally located lung nodules, far enough from both the apical segment and the lobar hilum to allow an oncologically safe thoracoscopic lower lobectomy or basal segmentectomy. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) including spirometry and plethysmography were performed 1 month after surgery and forced expiratory volume in 1 s, forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were collected; the difference, the loss and the recovery rate of pulmonary function were calculated and compared with the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. RESULTS During the study period, n = 45 and n = 16 patients for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lower lobectomy and for VATS basal segmentectomy, respectively, completed the study protocol: the 2 groups were homogeneous as to preoperative variables and PFT values. Postoperative outcomes were similar and PFTs revealed significant differences between postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s %, FVC%, ΔFVC and ΔFVC%. The loss percentage of FVC%, DLCO% and the recovery rate was better for FVC and DLCO in the VATS basal segmentectomy group. CONCLUSIONS Thoracoscopic basal segmentectomy seems to be associated with a more preserved lung function, maintaining more FVC and DLCO levels than lower lobectomy, and could be performed in selected cases ensuring also adequate oncological margins.

High inhaler resistance does not limit successful inspiratory maneuver among patients with asthma or COPD

Abstract: ABSTRACT Introduction There has been an active discussion on the sustainability of inhaler therapy in respiratory diseases, and it has cast a shadow on pMDIs which rely on propellant with high global warming potential (GWP). DPIs offer a lower GWP and effective alternative, but there has been concern whether all patients can generate sufficient inspiratory effort to disperse the drug. This review focuses on airflow resistance of DPIs and its clinical relevance. Areas covered For this narrative review, we searched the literature for studies comparing flow patterns with different devices. We also included a section on clinical trials comparing reliever administration with DPI, pMDI with spacer, and nebulizer during exacerbation. Expert opinion The evidence supports the efficacy of DPIs irrespective of respiratory condition or age of the patient even during acute exacerbations. Air flow resistance does not limit the use of DPIs and the patients were able to generate sufficient inspiratory flow rate with almost any device studied. None of 16 identified clinical trials comparing reliever administration via DPIs to other types of devices during exacerbation or bronchial challenge showed statistically significant difference between the device types in FEV1 recovery. DPIs performed as well as other types of inhaler devices even during asthma or COPD exacerbation.