scispace - formally typeset
F

Francisca Losavio

Researcher at Central University of Venezuela

Publications -  83
Citations -  703

Francisca Losavio is an academic researcher from Central University of Venezuela. The author has contributed to research in topics: Software architecture & Software quality. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 83 publications receiving 687 citations. Previous affiliations of Francisca Losavio include Central University, India.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality Characteristics for Software Architecture.

TL;DR: This work deals with the specification of quality requirements for software architecture, introducing a technique based on the ISO 91261 standard, used to help selecting a suitable architecture among a set of candidates, by comparing the values of the respective quality attributes.
Journal Article

ISO quality standards for measuring architectures

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors use the architectural design process proposed in the unified process framework, adapting and detailing it to include the quality requirements specification at the architectural level, with the use cases to facilitate the selection of the "key" use cases.
Journal ArticleDOI

ISO quality standards for measuring architectures

TL;DR: The goal of this work is to use the architectural design process proposed in the unified process framework, adapting and detailing it to include the quality requirements specification at architectural level, using the ISO 9126-1 standard quality model.
Journal ArticleDOI

A specification pattern for use cases

TL;DR: In this paper, general formats and guidelines are proposed, in an attempt to ameliorate the impact of frequently observed difficulties during the specification of use cases generated using "natural language" for the documentation of system functionality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Characterizing a data model for software measurement

TL;DR: A conceptual model of fully defined meaningful measures will help both the management board to give support to the data collection policy and the practitioner to avoid ambiguity in the definitions of the data measures.