As GDP is a measure of market capacity and not economic well-being, this report has been commissioned to more accurately understand the social progress indicators of any given state. Gross domestic product (GDP) is the most widely used measure of economic activity. There are international standards for its calculation, and much thought has gone into its statistical and conceptual bases. But GDP mainly measures market production, though it has often been treated as if it were a measure of economic well-being. Conflating the two can lead to misleading indications about how well-off people are and entail the wrong policy decisions. One reason why money measures of economic performance and living standards have come to play such an important role in our societies is that the monetary valuation of goods and services makes it easy to add up quantities of a very different nature. When we know the prices of apple juice and DVD players, we can add up their values and make statements about production and consumption in a single figure. But market prices are more than an accounting device. Economic theory tells us that when markets are functioning properly, the ratio of one market price to another is reflective of the relative appreciation of the two products by those who purchase them. Moreover, GDP captures all final goods in the economy, whether they are consumed by households, firms or government. Valuing them with their prices would thus seem to be a good way of capturing, in a single number, how well-off society is at a particular moment. Furthermore, keeping prices unchanged while observing how quantities of goods and services that enter GDP move over time would seem like a reasonable way of making a statement about how society’s living standards are evolving in real terms. As it turns out, things are more complicated. First, prices may not exist for some goods and services (if for instance government provides free health insurance or if households are engaged in child care), raising the question of how these services should be valued. Second, even where there are market prices, they may deviate from society’s underlying valuation. In particular, when the consumption or production of particular products affects society as a whole, the price that individuals pay for those products will differ from their value to society at large. Environmental damage caused by production or consumption activities that is not reflected in market prices is a well-known example.

https://andrewoswald.com/docs/stiglitz20report_commission20final20200920sept.pdf

Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress

This forthcoming chapter in the Handbook of Income Distribution (eds., A. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon) summarizes the literature on equality of opportunity. We begin by reviewing the philosophical debate concerning equality since Rawls (sections 1 and 2), present economic algorithms for computing policies which equalize opportunities, or, more generally, ways of ordering social policies with respect to their efficacy in opportunity equalization (sections 3, 4 and 5), apply the approach to the conceptualization of economic development (section 6), discuss dynamic issues (section 7), give a preamble to a discussion of empirical work (section 8), provide evidence of population views from surveys and experiments concerning conceptions of equality (section 9), and a discuss measurement issues, summarizing the empirical literature on inequality of opportunity to date (section 10). We conclude with mention of some critiques of the equal-opportunity approach, and some predictions (section 11).

Equality of Opportunity

Foundations of Economic Analysis

Introduction 1. Defining Fairness 2. Distributing Fairly 3. Introduction to Incentive Issues 4. Unequal skills 5. Income Redistribution 6. Risk, Insurance, and Option Luck 7. Fresh Starts 8. Utilitarian Reward 9. Inequalities of Opportunity and Social Mobility 10. Responsibility, Freedom, and Social Justice

Fairness, responsibility, and welfare

Minimum Cardinality Matrix Decomposition into Consecutive-Ones Matrices: CP and IP Approaches.- Connections in Networks: Hardness of Feasibility Versus Optimality.- Modeling the Regular Constraint with Integer Programming.- Hybrid Local Search for Constrained Financial Portfolio Selection Problems.- The "Not-Too-Heavy Spanning Tree" Constraint.- Eliminating Redundant Clauses in SAT Instances.- Cost-Bounded Binary Decision Diagrams for 0-1 Programming.- YIELDS: A Yet Improved Limited Discrepancy Search for CSPs.- A Global Constraint for Total Weighted Completion Time.- Computing Tight Time Windows for RCPSPWET with the Primal-Dual Method.- Necessary Condition for Path Partitioning Constraints.- A Constraint Programming Approach to the Hospitals / Residents Problem.- Best-First AND/OR Search for 0/1 Integer Programming.- A Position-Based Propagator for the Open-Shop Problem.- Directional Interchangeability for Enhancing CSP Solving.- A Continuous Multi-resources cumulative Constraint with Positive-Negative Resource Consumption-Production.- Replenishment Planning for Stochastic Inventory Systems with Shortage Cost.- Preprocessing Expression-Based Constraint Satisfaction Problems for Stochastic Local Search.- The Deviation Constraint.- The Linear Programming Polytope of Binary Constraint Problems with Bounded Tree-Width.- On Boolean Functions Encodable as a Single Linear Pseudo-Boolean Constraint.- Solving a Stochastic Queueing Control Problem with Constraint Programming.- Constrained Clustering Via Concavity Cuts.- Bender's Cuts Guided Large Neighborhood Search for the Traveling Umpire Problem.- A Large Neighborhood Search Heuristic for Graph Coloring.- Generalizations of the Global Cardinality Constraint for Hierarchical Resources.- A Column Generation Based Destructive Lower Bound for Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problems.

Integration of AI and OR techniques in constraint programming for combinatorial optimization problems : 4th International Conference, CPAIOR 2007, Brussels, Belgium, May 23-26, 2007 : proceedings

The definition and measurement of social welfare have been a vexed issue for the past century. This book makes a constructive, easily applicable proposal and suggests how to evaluate the economic situation of a society in a way that gives priority to the worse-off and that respects each individual's preferences over his or her own consumption, work, leisure and so on. This approach resonates with the current concern to go 'beyond the GDP' in the measurement of social progress. Compared to technical studies in welfare economics, this book emphasizes constructive results rather than paradoxes and impossibilities, and shows how one can start from basic principles of efficiency and fairness and end up with concrete evaluations of policies. Compared to more philosophical treatments of social justice, this book is more precise about the definition of social welfare and reaches conclusions about concrete policies and institutions only after a rigorous derivation from clearly stated principles.

/pdf/a-theory-of-fairness-and-social-welfare-4yj11rc3i2.pdf

A Theory of Fairness and Social Welfare

Fairness is a key concept in redistribution issues. In this paper, we study how particular requirements of fairness can shed light on the design of the optimal income tax schedule. We consider a population of heterogeneous individuals (or households), who differ in two respects. First, they have unequal skills and, therefore, unequal earning abilities. Second, they differ in terms of their preferences about consumption and leisure and, as a consequence, typically make different labour time choices. Both kinds of differences generate income inequalities. We study how to justify and compute a redistribution income tax in this context. Redistribution through an income tax usually entails distortions of incentives, but the resulting efficiency loss has to be weighed against potential improvements in the fairness of the distribution of resources. We address this efficiency–equity trade-off here by constructing social preferences which obey the standard Pareto principle in addition to fairness conditions.

Fair Income Tax

A characterization of the Shapley value in queueing problems

This book is a collection of articles written by the two authors on the topic of equality of opportunity. All articles build on the idea that a just society should equalize the resources that determine the opportunities agents face in order to follow their goals. Resources are either external, like financial resources, or internal, like preferences or skills. The authors propose to define "equality of opportunity" as the combination of ethical principles of compensation and responsibility. The principle of compensation requires external resources to be used to compensate low-skilled agents (considering that inequalities due to skill differences are unjust). The principle of responsibility requires external resources to be allocated without regards to inequalities due to differences in preferences (considering that these inequalities are not unjust). The articles present different ways of combining the two principles in different economic contexts.

François Maniquet

Papers

A Theory of Fairness and Social Welfare

Fair Income Tax

A Theory of Fairness and Social Welfare

A characterization of the Shapley value in queueing problems

Equality of Opportunity: The Economics of Responsibility