scispace - formally typeset
F

Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius

Researcher at Radboud University Nijmegen

Publications -  51
Citations -  1856

Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius is an academic researcher from Radboud University Nijmegen. The author has contributed to research in topics: Data Protection Act 1998 & General Data Protection Regulation. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 46 publications receiving 1178 citations. Previous affiliations of Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius include University of Amsterdam.

Papers
More filters
Posted Content

The Perfect Match? A Closer Look at the Relationship between EU Consumer Law and Data Protection Law

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that consumer law and data protection law can usefully complement each other and argue that using consumer rights, consumers should be able to challenge excessive collection of their personal data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Singling Out People without Knowing Their Names - Behavioural targeting, pseudonymous data, and the new Data Protection Regulation

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that data protection law should apply to behavioural targeting and see data used to single out a person as personal data, which fits the rationale for data protection laws: protecting fairness and privacy.
Posted Content

Tracking Walls, Take-It-Or-Leave-It Choices, the GDPR, and the ePrivacy Regulation

TL;DR: A list of circumstances to assess when a tracking wall makes consent invalid is provided, and how the EU lawmaker could regulate tracking walls is explored, for instance in the ePrivacy Regulation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Informed Consent: We Can Do Better to Defend Privacy

TL;DR: Informed consent as a means to protect privacy is flawed, especially when considering the privacy problems of behavioral targeting.
Journal ArticleDOI

Does everyone have a price? Understanding people’s attitude towards online and offline price discrimination

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyse consumer attitudes towards different sorts of price discrimination to gain a better understanding of the drivers of people's acceptance or rejection of pricing discrimination in different settings, and of the economic and demographic factors underlying people's attitudes.