Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation

Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 1: Optimization of passive vortex generators

Weak longitudinal (streamwise) vortices produced by the interaction of simple, round wall jets with a two-dimensional flow comprising a turbulent boundary layer were studied experimentally. Like the jets used in the vortex generator jet (VGJ) method of stall control, the jets were pitched up at 45 deg and skewed relative to the freestream as they entered from the wall.

Streamwise vortex production by pitched and skewed jets in a turbulent boundary layer

The application of pulsed vortex generator jets to control separation on the suction surface of a low-pressure turbine blade is reported. Blade Reynolds numbers in the experimental, linear turbine cascade match those for high-altitude aircraft engines and aft stages of industrial turbine engines with elevated turbine inlet temperatures. The vortex generator jets have a 30 deg pitch and a 90 deg skew to the free-stream direction. Jet flow oscillations up to 100 Hz are produced using a high-frequency solenoid feed valve. Results are compared to steady blowing at jet blowing ratios less than 4 and at two chordwise positions upstream of the nominal separation zone. Results show that pulsed vortex generator jets produce a bulk flow effect comparable to that of steady jets with an order of magnitude less massflow. Boundary layer traverses and blade static pressure distributions show that separation is almost completely eliminated with the application of unsteady blowing. Reductions of over 50 percent in the wake loss profile of the controlled blade were measured. Experimental evidence suggests that the mechanism for unsteady control lies in the starting and ending transitions of the pulsing cycle rather than the injected jet stream itself. Boundary layer spectra support this conclusion and highlight significant differences between the steady and unsteady control techniques. The pulsed vortex generator jets are effective at both chordwise injection locations tested (45 and 63 percent axial chord) covering a substantial portion of the blade suction surface. This insensitivity to injection location bodes well for practical application of pulsed VGJ control where the separation location may not be accurately known a priori.

Turbine Separation Control Using Pulsed Vortex Generator Jets

This report provides an overview on the current state of wind turbine control and introduces a number of active techniques that could be potentially used for control of wind turbine blades. The focus is on research regarding active flow control (AFC) as it applies to wind turbine performance and loads. The techniques and concepts described here are often described as 'smart structures' or 'smart rotor control'. This field is rapidly growing and there are numerous concepts currently being investigated around the world; some concepts already are focused on the wind energy industry and others are intended for use in other fields, but have the potential for wind turbine control. An AFC system can be broken into three categories: controls and sensors, actuators and devices, and the flow phenomena. This report focuses on the research involved with the actuators and devices and the generated flow phenomena caused by each device.

/pdf/active-load-control-techniques-for-wind-turbines-3jqmdt7ots.pdf

Active load control techniques for wind turbines.

Relative performance of several passive and active methods for controlling two-dimensional turbulent separated flow associated with a curved backward-facing ramp were investigated at low speeds. Surface static pressure measurement and oil flow visualization results indicate that submerged vortex generators, vortex generator jets, elongated arches at +-alpha, and large-eddy breakup devices at +-alpha placed near the baseline separation location reduce flow separation and increase pressure recovery. Spanwise cylinders reduce flow separation but decrease pressure recovery downstream. Arches with alpha = 0 deg, Helmholtz resonators, and Viets' fluidic flappers examined so far have no significant effect in reducing separation. Wall cooling computation indicates that separation delay on a partially cooled ramp is nearly the same as on a fully-cooled ramp while minimizing the frictional drag increase associated with the wall cooling process.

Investigation of several passive and active methods for turbulent flow separation control

Relative performance of several passive and active methods for controlling two-dimensional turbulent separated flow associated with a curved backward-facing ramp were investigated at low speeds. Surface static pressure measurement and oil flow visualization results indicate that transverse grooves, longitudinal grooves, submerged vortex generators (with h/δ ~ O(0.1–0.2)), vortex generator jets (with β ≃ 90°, α ≃ 15°), elongated arches at +α, and huge-eddy breakup devices (LEBU’s) at +a placed near the baseline separation location reduce flow separation and increase pressure recovery. Spanwise cylinders reduce flow separation but decrease pressure recovery downstream. Arches and LEBU’s with α ≤ 0° examined so far have no significant effect in reducing separation. Wall cooling computation indicates that separation delay on a partially cooled ramp is nearly the same as on a fully-cooled ramp while minimizing the frictional drag increase associated with the wall cooling process.

G. V. Selby

Papers

Investigation of several passive and active methods for turbulent flow separation control

Comparative Study of Control Techniques for Two-Dimensional Low-Speed Turbulent Flow Separation