Showing papers by "Geert-Jan Dinant published in 1991"

Discriminating ability of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate: a prospective study in general practice.

Abstract: Despite its frequent use, little is known about the ability of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate to discriminate between 9pathology9 (inflammatory diseases and malignancies) and 9no pathology9 in general practice. This has been studied by following 362 patients who presented to their general practitioner with a new complaint, for which the general practitioner considered determination of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate to be indicated. The test was performed at the local hospital laboratory and the patients were seen again after three months, in order to establish the follow-up diagnoses. By comparing the test results with the follow-up diagnoses, combined with receiver operating characteristic curves and regression analysis, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate was found to have a reasonable discriminating ability with respect to malignancies and inflammatory diseases (sensitivity 53%, specificity 94%, positive predictive value 48%, negative predictive value 91%, odds ratio 15.1). The upper limit for the normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate should be set at approximately 12 mm hour-1 for men and 28 mm hour-1 for women, and needs no correction for age. It is concluded that the erythrocyte sedimentation rate still deserves a place in the general practitioner9s daily routine.

Leucocyte Count as an Alternative to ESR in General Practice

Abstract: We investigated the ability of the leucocyte count to discriminate between "inflammatory diseases and malignancies" on the one hand and other, often harmless and self-limiting diseases on the other, and compared this ability with that of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in general practice. In cooperation with nine general practitioners (GP) we prospectively followed 151 patients who were seen by their GP because of a new complaint for which the GP wanted to know their ESR. ESR and one leucocyte count measurement (Technicon H6000) were performed at the local hospital laboratory. The patients were seen again after three months, to determine the follow-up diagnoses. By comparing the test results with the follow-up diagnoses, ESR was found to have a better discriminating ability than the leucocyte count test (ESR: sensitivity = 53%, specificity = 84%, positive predictive value = 29%, negative predictive value = 93%, Odds Ratio = 5.73). Using Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis, this conclusion could be shown to be independent of the chosen reference values. We conclude that the determination of the leucocyte count is not a clinically interesting alternative to ESR.

Diagnostic value of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate in general practice

Abstract: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers.