Aim: The goal of this European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) guideline project is to give an overview of the existing evidence on the management of diverticular disease, primarily as a guidance to surgeons. Methods: The guideline was developed during several working phases including three voting rounds and one consensus meeting. The two project leads (JKS and EA) appointed by the ESCP guideline committee together with one member of the guideline committee (WB) agreed on the methodology, decided on six themes for working groups (WGs) and drafted a list of research questions. Senior WG members, mostly colorectal surgeons within the ESCP, were invited based on publication records and geographical aspects. Other specialties were included in the WGs where relevant. In addition, one trainee or PhD fellow was invited in each WG. All six WGs revised the research questions if necessary, did a literature search, created evidence tables where feasible, and drafted supporting text to each research question and statement. The text and statement proposals from each WG were arranged as one document by the first and last authors before online voting by all authors in two rounds. For the second voting ESCP national representatives were also invited. More than 90% agreement was considered a consensus. The final phrasing of the statements with < 90% agreement was discussed in a consensus meeting at the ESCP annual meeting in Vienna in September 2019. Thereafter, the first and the last author drafted the final text of the guideline and circulated it for final approval and for a third and final online voting of rephrased statements. Results: This guideline contains 38 evidence based consensus statements on the management of diverticular disease. Conclusion: This international, multidisciplinary guideline provides an up to date summary of the current knowledge of the management of diverticular disease as a guidance for clinicians and patients.

/pdf/european-society-of-coloproctology-guidelines-for-the-1hbr6tw3ec.pdf

European Society of Coloproctology: guidelines for the management of diverticular disease of the colon

PURPOSENowadays laparoscopic colorectal surgery has demonstrated its advantages, including reduced postoperative pain, decreased duration of ileus, and shorter hospital stay. Few studies report results of laparoscopic surgery in complicated diverticulitis. This study was designed to analyze the results of laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in patients with fistulized sigmoiditis.METHODSThe authors retrospectively reviewed 16 patients who had laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for fistulized diverticulitis between 1992 and 2003 in a series of 247 laparoscopic colectomies. Eleven patients presented with colovesical, four with colovaginal, and one with colocutaneous fistulas; all were caused by sigmoiditis. The procedure always consisted of celioscopic sigmoidectomy with stapled transanal suture and, when indicated, closure of the cystic or vaginal fistula orifice.RESULTSMean age was 60 (range, 39–78) years. Mean number of episodes of diverticulitis before operation was three (range, 1–5). Mean time between the last episode and operation was 46 (range, 2–250) weeks. In our first three years of experience, three cases (18.7 percent) were converted to laparotomy. Reasons for conversion were the necessity for intestinal resection, splenectomy, and a wound of the anterior rectum. The mean operative time was 172 (range, 100–280) minutes. Mean hospital stay was 5.7 (range, 3–12) days. There was no mortality. Postoperative morbidity (2 patients, 12.5 percent) consisted of one pulmonary infection and one splenectomy. Long-term follow-up revealed no recurrence of diverticulitis and one incisional hernia.CONCLUSIONSIn experienced hands, laparoscopic sigmoidectomy may be a safe and effective procedure for fistulized sigmoiditis.

Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for fistulized diverticulitis

Laparoscopic Surgery for Diverticular Fistulas: Outcomes of 111 Consecutive Cases at a Single Institution

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is being increasingly used for management of common bile duct (CBD) stones. Primary CBD closure has been reported to have better short-term outcomes compared to T-tube placement. However, primary CBD closure cannot be performed in all patients. This study aims to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of LCBDE with primary CBD closure in appropriately selected patients and compare them with T-tube drainage. Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing LCBDE in our department from June 2011 to October 2014 was performed. Primary closure was performed in 52 patients (group A), and a T-tube was placed in 33 patients (group B). Patient demographics, intraoperative findings, postoperative stay, complications, and long-term follow-up data were recorded and compared. The mean operating time was much longer in group A compared to group B (113.92 vs. 95.92 min, p = 0.032). The overall complication rate (9.6 vs. 6.3%, p = 0.701) and hospital stay (4 vs. 5.11 days, p = 0.088) were similar in both groups. No patient required conversion to the open procedure. Bile leakage was more frequent in group A (5.78 vs. 0%, p = 0.279), but this was not statistically significant. All three patients with bile leakage were treated successfully by conservative measures and gradual drain withdrawal. On long-term follow-up, recurrent stones were detected in two patients in group A. No patient was found to develop CBD stricture. LCBDE and primary CBD closure has excellent short- and long-term outcomes when performed in appropriately selected patients.

Appropriate Patient Selection Is Essential for the Success of Primary Closure After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration

When the bowel meets the bladder: Optimal management of colorectal pathology with urological involvement

When the bowel meets the bladder: Optimal management of colorectal pathology with urological involvement.

Objective Colovesical fistulas (CVF) constitute the most common type of spontaneously occurring fistulas associated with diverticular disease. One-stage laparoscopic resection has been shown to be feasible, but studies comparing this approach to open surgery are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgery for CVF of diverticular origin. Materials and methods From January 2000 to July 2014, 37 colectomies were performed for diverticular disease-related CVF. Twenty-eight patients who underwent resection and primary anastomosis were divided in 2 groups: the laparoscopic surgery group (group A) and the open surgery group (group B). We have analyzed the following parameters: operative time, complication rate, hospital stay, recurrence, and early mortality rate. Results Groups A and B were comparable in terms of age, sex, diverticulitis episodes, previous abdominal surgery, and body mass index.The mean duration of surgery was significantly shorter in group B: 175 versus 237 minutes (P=0.011). There was a faster recovery of gastrointestinal transit in group A (2 vs. 13; P=0, 0002). However, there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to serious postoperative morbidity [(Clavien-Dindo scores of 3, 4, and 5) 4 vs. 0; P=0.098)] and with respect to hospital stay (10.5 vs. 9.5 d; P=0.537). There was no recurrence during a median follow-up of 12 months. Conclusions Laparoscopic resection and primary anastomosis should be considered a safe and feasible option for the management of diverticular CVF. Despite progresses in minimally invasive colorectal surgery, the conversion rate and morbidity are still high.

Colovesical Fistula Complicating Diverticular Disease: A 14-Year Experience.

INTRODUCTION To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of primary closure (PC) and biliary drainage (BD), after the laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones by choledocotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 2009 and December 2014, 102 patients underwent laparoscopy for lithiasis of the CBD. Intraoperative cholangiography was systematically performed, followed by choledocoscopy, depending on the size of the CBD. RESULTS Eighty (78.4%) of the 102 patients underwent laparoscopic stone extraction by choledocotomy, and were assigned to 2 groups: PC (group A, n=25), and BD (group B, n=55). Groups A and B were comparable in terms of age (62.3±26.1 vs. 66.0±19.3 y; P=0.53), the percentage of women (72.0% vs. 76.4%; P=0.68), body mass index (25.9±6.1 vs. 26.9±4.4 kg/m; P=0.52), and CBD diameter (11.6±3.1 vs. 12.1±3.8 mm; P=0.59). The mean durations of surgery and of hospital stay were significantly shorter in group A: 179±38 versus 211±57 minutes (P=0.02) and 5.4±2.0 versus 8.4±3.2 days (P<0.001). Groups A and B were comparable in terms of serious postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo scores of 3, 4, and 5): 2 versus 4 (P=1). In group B, bile drain removal was complicated by choleperitoneum in 3 cases. CONCLUSIONS With shorter durations of surgery and hospital stay, equivalent postoperative morbi-mortality, and an absence of the specific morbidity due to bile drainage, PC may be considered a safe and feasible option for the laparoscopic management of CBD stones by choledocotomy.

Geoffroy Leroux

Papers

Colovesical Fistula Complicating Diverticular Disease: A 14-Year Experience.

Primary Closure Versus Biliary Drainage After Laparoscopic Choledocotomy: Results of a Comparative Study.