The term ‘‘Internet-of-Things’’ is used as an umbrella keyword for covering various aspects related to the extension of the Internet and the Web into the physical realm, by means of the widespread deployment of spatially distributed devices with embedded identification, sensing and/or actuation capabilities. Internet-of-Things envisions a future in which digital and physical entities can be linked, by means of appropriate information and communication technologies, to enable a whole new class of applications and services. In this article, we present a survey of technologies, applications and research challenges for Internetof-Things.

/pdf/internet-of-things-vision-applications-and-research-4xfstaiv80.pdf

Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges

In this article we propose a standard for role-based access control (RBAC). Although RBAC models have received broad support as a generalized approach to access control, and are well recognized for their many advantages in performing large-scale authorization management, no single authoritative definition of RBAC exists today. This lack of a widely accepted model results in uncertainty and confusion about RBAC's utility and meaning. The standard proposed here seeks to resolve this situation by unifying ideas from a base of frequently referenced RBAC models, commercial products, and research prototypes. It is intended to serve as a foundation for product development, evaluation, and procurement specification. Although RBAC continues to evolve as users, researchers, and vendors gain experience with its application, we feel the features and components proposed in this standard represent a fundamental and stable set of mechanisms that may be enhanced by developers in further meeting the needs of their customers. As such, this document does not attempt to standardize RBAC features beyond those that have achieved acceptance in the commercial marketplace and research community, but instead focuses on defining a fundamental and stable set of RBAC components. This standard is organized into the RBAC Reference Model and the RBAC System and Administrative Functional Specification. The reference model defines the scope of features that comprise the standard and provides a consistent vocabulary in support of the specification. The RBAC System and Administrative Functional Specification defines functional requirements for administrative operations and queries for the creation, maintenance, and review of RBAC sets and relations, as well as for specifying system level functionality in support of session attribute management and an access control decision process.

/pdf/proposed-nist-standard-for-role-based-access-control-2dc3elpcvo.pdf

Proposed NIST standard for role-based access control

The Ponder language provides a common means of specifying security policies that map onto various access control implementation mechanisms for firewalls, operating systems, databases and Java. It supports obligation policies that are event triggered condition-action rules for policy based management of networks and distributed systems. Ponder can also be used for security management activities such as registration of users or logging and auditing events for dealing with access to critical resources or security violations. Key concepts of the language include roles to group policies relating to a position in an organisation, relationships to define interactions between roles and management structures to define a configuration of roles and relationships pertaining to an organisational unit such as a department. These reusable composite policy specifications cater for the complexity of large enterprise information systems. Ponder is declarative, strongly-typed and object-oriented which makes the language flexible, extensible and adaptable to a wide range of management requirements.

/pdf/the-ponder-policy-specification-language-4e9nkz9hq5.pdf

The Ponder Policy Specification Language

http://www.parkjonghyuk.net/lecture/2015-1st-lecture/networksecurity/Paper1.pdf

Security, privacy and trust in Internet of Things

Traditional interactive applications are limited to using only the input that users explicitly provide. As users move away from traditional desktop computing environments and move towards mobile and ubiquitous computing environments, there is a greater need for applications to leverage from implicit information, or context. These types of environments are rich in context, with users and devices moving around and computational services becoming available or disappearing over time. This information is usually not available to applications but can be useful in adapting the way in which it performs its services and in changing the available services. Applications that use context are known as context-aware applications. 
This research in context-aware computing has focused on the development of a software architecture to support the building of context-aware applications. While developers have been able to build context-aware applications, they have been limited to using a small variety of sensors that provide only simple context such as identity and location. This dissertation presents a set of requirements and component abstractions for a conceptual supporting framework. The framework along with an identified design process makes it easier to acquire and deliver context to applications, and in turn, build more complex context-aware applications. 
In addition, an implementation of the framework called the Context Toolkit is discussed, along with a number of context-aware applications that have been built with it. The applications illustrate how the toolkit is used in practice and allows an exploration of the design space of context-aware computing. This dissertation also shows how the Context Toolkit has been used as a research testbed, supporting the investigation of difficult problems in context-aware computing such as the building of high-level programming abstractions, dealing with ambiguous or inaccurate context data and controlling access to personal context.

/pdf/providing-architectural-support-for-building-context-aware-1y6c5sg04e.pdf

Providing architectural support for building context-aware applications

Security administration of large systems is complex, but it can be simplified by a role-based access control approach. This article explains why RBAC is receiving renewed attention as a method of security administration and review, describes a framework of four reference models developed to better understand RBAC and categorizes different implementations, and discusses the use of RBAC to manage itself.

Role-based access control models

Recently there has been considerable interest in role-based access control (RBAC) as an alternative, and supplement, to the traditional discretionary and mandatory access controls (DAC and MAC) embodied in the Orange Book. The roots of RBAC can be traced back to the earliest access control systems. Roles have been used in a number of systems for segregating various aspects of security and system administration. Recent interest in RBAC has been motivated by the use of roles at the application level to control access to application data. This is an important innovation which offers the opportunity to realize benefits in securing an organization's information assets, similar to the benefits of employing databases instead of files as the data repository. A number of proposals for RBAC have been published in the literature, but there is no consensus on precisely what is meant by RBAC. This paper lays the groundwork for developing this consensus. In our view RBAC is a concept which has several dimensions, all of which may not be present in a given system or product. We envisage each dimension as being linearly ordered with respect to the sophistication of features provided. This leads us to the idea of a multi-dimension model for RBAC. Achieving agreement on what these dimensions are, and how the features in each dimension should be ordered, will take debate and time. Our contribution here is to lay out a vision on how to approach a common understanding of RBAC, and take a first cut at identifying the dimensions of RBAC. A major benefit of such a multidimensional RBAC would be to allow comparison of different products and assess their appropriateness for various system requirements. >

H.L. Feinstein

Papers

Role-based access control models

Role-based access control: a multi-dimensional view