BACKGROUND Increased neuronal activity in the subthalamic nucleus and the pars interna of the globus pallidus is thought to account for motor dysfunction in patients with Parkinson's disease. Although creating lesions in these structures improves motor function in monkeys with induced parkinsonism and patients with Parkinson's disease, such lesions are associated with neurologic deficits, particularly when they are created bilaterally. Deep-brain stimulation simulates the effects of a lesion without destroying brain tissue. METHODS We performed a prospective, double-blind, crossover study in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease, in whom electrodes were implanted in the subthalamic nucleus or pars interna of the globus pallidus and who then underwent bilateral high-frequency deep-brain stimulation. We compared scores on the motor portion of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale when the stimulation was randomly assigned to be turned on or off. We performed unblinded evaluations of motor function preoperatively and one, three, and six months postoperatively. RESULTS Electrodes were implanted bilaterally in 96 patients in the subthalamic-nucleus group and 38 patients in the globus-pallidus group. Three months after the procedures were performed, double-blind, crossover evaluations demonstrated that stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus was associated with a median improvement in the motor score (as compared with no stimulation) of 49 percent, and stimulation of the pars interna of the globus pallidus with a median improvement of 37 percent (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Between the preoperative and six-month visits, the percentage of time during the day that patients had good mobility without involuntary movements increased from 27 percent to 74 percent (P<0.001) with subthalamic stimulation and from 28 percent to 64 percent (P<0.001) with pallidal stimulation. Adverse events included intracranial hemorrhage in seven patients and infection necessitating removal of the leads in two. CONCLUSIONS Bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus or pars interna of the globus pallidus is associated with significant improvement in motor function in patients with Parkinson's disease whose condition cannot be further improved with medical therapy.

/pdf/deep-brain-stimulation-of-the-subthalamic-nucleus-or-the-2baf2gi0or.pdf

Deep-brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus or the pars interna of the globus pallidus in Parkinson's disease.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is associated with significant improvement of motor complications in patients with severe Parkinson's disease after some 6-12 months of treatment. Long-term results in a large number of patients have been reported only from a single study centre. We report 69 Parkinson's disease patients treated with bilateral DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN, n = 49) or globus pallidus internus (GPi, n = 20) included in a multicentre study. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at 1 year and 3-4 years after surgery. The primary outcome measure was the change in the 'off' medication score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor part (UPDRS-III) at 3-4 years. Stimulation of the STN or GPi induced a significant improvement (50 and 39%; P < 0.0001) of the 'off' medication UPDRS-III score at 3-4 years with respect to baseline. Stimulation improved cardinal features and activities of daily living (ADL) (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.02 for STN and GPi, respectively) and prolonged the 'on' time spent with good mobility without dyskinesias (P < 0.00001). Daily dosage of levodopa was significantly reduced (35%) in the STN-treated group only (P < 0.001). Comparison of the improvement induced by stimulation at 1 year with 3-4 years showed a significant worsening in the 'on' medication motor states of the UPDRS-III, ADL and gait in both STN and GPi groups, and speech and postural stability in the STN-treated group. Adverse events (AEs) included cognitive decline, speech difficulty, instability, gait disorders and depression. These were more common in patients treated with DBS of the STN. No patient abandoned treatment as a result of these side effects. This experience, which represents the first multicentre study assessing the long-term efficacy of either STN or GPi stimulation, shows a significant and substantial clinically important therapeutic benefit for at least 3-4 years in a large cohort of patients with severe Parkinson's disease.

/pdf/bilateral-deep-brain-stimulation-in-parkinson-s-disease-a-o5odz64uwv.pdf

Bilateral deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a multicentre study with 4 years follow-up

Recent years have seen a rapid rise in the medical and recreational use of cannabis: a broad term that can be used to describe the various products and chemical compounds (e.g., marijuana, cannabinoids) derived from different species of the cannabis plant. Despite increased cannabis use and a changing state-level policy landscape, conclusive evidence regarding the shortand long-term health effects—both harms and benefits—of cannabis use remains elusive.

/pdf/the-health-effects-of-cannabis-and-cannabinoids-the-current-10v11e4i7b.pdf

The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research

Objective: To assess the safety, tolerability, and biological activity of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) administered by an implanted intracerebroventricular (ICV) catheter and access port in advanced PD. Background: GDNF is a peptide that promotes survival of dopamine neurons. It improved 6-OHDA- or MPTP-induced behavioral deficits in rodents and monkeys. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential cohort study compared the effects of monthly ICV administration of placebo and 25, 75, 150, 300, and 500 to 4,000 μg of GDNF in 50 subjects with PD for 8 months. An open-label study extended exposure up to an additional 20 months and maximum single doses of up to 4,000 μg in 16 subjects. Laboratory testing, adverse events (AE), and Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scoring were obtained at 1- to 4-week intervals throughout the studies. Results: Twelve subjects received placebo and seven or eight subjects were assigned to each of the other GDNF dose groups. “On” and “off” total and motor UPDRS scores were not improved by GDNF at any dose. Nausea, anorexia, and vomiting were common hours to several days after injections of GDNF. Weight loss occurred in the majority of subjects receiving 75 μg or larger doses of GDNF. Paresthesias, often described as electric shocks (Lhermitte sign), were common in GDNF-treated subjects, were not dose related, and resolved on discontinuation of GDNF. Asymptomatic hyponatremia occurred in over half of subjects receiving 75 μg or larger doses of GDNF; it was symptomatic in several subjects. The open-label extension study had similar AE and lack of therapeutic efficacy. Conclusions: GDNF administered by ICV injection is biologically active as evidenced by the spectrum of AE encountered in this study. GDNF did not improve parkinsonism, possibly because GDNF did not reach the target tissues—putamen and substantia nigra.

Randomized, double-blind trial of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) in PD

In 1992 the Core Assessment Program for Intracerebral Transplantations (CAPIT) was published providing the minimal requirements for a common patient evaluation protocol. Despite the intent, the program was thought to be too laborious to carry out in large scale trials, and it also lacked evaluations of cognitive functions and quality of life. Moreover, the CAPIT was designed for neural transplantation only and has not been revised since. Since then, pallidotomy and deep brain stimulation have emerged as additional treatment modalities but there exists no common tool for evaluation of, and between, the techniques. In 1996, within the framework of NECTAR (Network for European CNS Transplantation and Restoration), a dedicated program entitled "Neurosurgical Interventions in Parkinson's Disease" (NIPD) was funded by the European Union Biomed 2 program to develop a new Core Assessment Program for Surgical Interventional Therapies in PD (CAPSIT-PD) and to establish an European registry for patients with PD subjected to functional neurosurgery. This article presents the recommendations of this new program.

Core assessment program for surgical interventional therapies in Parkinson's disease (CAPSIT-PD).

Although dyskinesia is a frequent and important problem in Parkinson's disease (PD), a reliable assessment measure has not been thoroughly developed and tested. We modified the Obeso dyskinesia scale to create an objective rating scale for dyskinesia assessment during activities of daily living. Thirteen physicians and 15 study coordinators involved in a clinical trial independently reviewed videotape segments of PD patients performing three tasks: walking, putting on a coat, and lifting a cup to the lips for drinking. Raters evaluated the severity of worst dyskinesia seen, the types of all dyskinesias seen, and the type of dyskinesia most associated with motoric disability. For all assessments, the total group showed statistically significant inter- and intrarater reliability. Physicians had a higher consistency than did coordinators, but for most measures the difference was not statistically significant. Physicians and coordinators found the scale easy to use and especially practical for rating dyskinesia severity and for identifying the most disabling dyskinesia. Dyskinesias can be assessed in clinical trials and warrant regular documentation.

H. M. Shale

Papers

Utility of an objective dyskinesia rating scale for Parkinson's disease: inter- and intrarater reliability assessment.