Cellular senescence suppresses cancer by arresting cell proliferation, essentially permanently, in response to oncogenic stimuli, including genotoxic stress. We modified the use of antibody arrays to provide a quantitative assessment of factors secreted by senescent cells. We show that human cells induced to senesce by genotoxic stress secrete myriad factors associated with inflammation and malignancy. This senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) developed slowly over several days and only after DNA damage of sufficient magnitude to induce senescence. Remarkably similar SASPs developed in normal fibroblasts, normal epithelial cells, and epithelial tumor cells after genotoxic stress in culture, and in epithelial tumor cells in vivo after treatment of prostate cancer patients with DNA-damaging chemotherapy. In cultured premalignant epithelial cells, SASPs induced an epithelial-mesenchyme transition and invasiveness, hallmarks of malignancy, by a paracrine mechanism that depended largely on the SASP factors interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8. Strikingly, two manipulations markedly amplified, and accelerated development of, the SASPs: oncogenic RAS expression, which causes genotoxic stress and senescence in normal cells, and functional loss of the p53 tumor suppressor protein. Both loss of p53 and gain of oncogenic RAS also exacerbated the promalignant paracrine activities of the SASPs. Our findings define a central feature of genotoxic stress-induced senescence. Moreover, they suggest a cell-nonautonomous mechanism by which p53 can restrain, and oncogenic RAS can promote, the development of age-related cancer by altering the tissue microenvironment.

/pdf/senescence-associated-secretory-phenotypes-reveal-cell-3ausyfpgag.pdf

Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotypes Reveal Cell-Nonautonomous Functions of Oncogenic RAS and the p53 Tumor Suppressor

PLoS BIOLOGY Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotypes Reveal Cell-Nonautonomous Functions of Oncogenic RAS and the p53 Tumor Suppressor Jean-Philippe Coppe 1 , Christopher K. Patil 1[ , Francis Rodier 1,2[ , Yu Sun 3 , Denise P. Mun oz 1,2 , Joshua Goldstein 1¤ , Peter S. Nelson 3 , Pierre-Yves Desprez 1,4 , Judith Campisi 1,2* 1 Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America, 2 Buck Institute for Age Research, Novato, California, United States of America, 3 Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America, 4 California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, California, United States of America Cellular senescence suppresses cancer by arresting cell proliferation, essentially permanently, in response to oncogenic stimuli, including genotoxic stress. We modified the use of antibody arrays to provide a quantitative assessment of factors secreted by senescent cells. We show that human cells induced to senesce by genotoxic stress secrete myriad factors associated with inflammation and malignancy. This senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) developed slowly over several days and only after DNA damage of sufficient magnitude to induce senescence. Remarkably similar SASPs developed in normal fibroblasts, normal epithelial cells, and epithelial tumor cells after genotoxic stress in culture, and in epithelial tumor cells in vivo after treatment of prostate cancer patients with DNA- damaging chemotherapy. In cultured premalignant epithelial cells, SASPs induced an epithelial–mesenchyme transition and invasiveness, hallmarks of malignancy, by a paracrine mechanism that depended largely on the SASP factors interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8. Strikingly, two manipulations markedly amplified, and accelerated development of, the SASPs: oncogenic RAS expression, which causes genotoxic stress and senescence in normal cells, and functional loss of the p53 tumor suppressor protein. Both loss of p53 and gain of oncogenic RAS also exacerbated the promalignant paracrine activities of the SASPs. Our findings define a central feature of genotoxic stress-induced senescence. Moreover, they suggest a cell-nonautonomous mechanism by which p53 can restrain, and oncogenic RAS can promote, the development of age-related cancer by altering the tissue microenvironment. Citation: Coppe JP, Patil CK, Rodier F, Sun Y, Mun oz DP, et al. (2008) Senescence-associated secretory phenotypes reveal cell-nonautonomous functions of oncogenic RAS and the p53 tumor suppressor. PLoS Biol 6(12): e301. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060301 Introduction Cancer is a multistep disease in which cells acquire increasingly malignant phenotypes. These phenotypes are acquired in part by somatic mutations, which derange normal controls over cell proliferation (growth), survival, invasion, and other processes important for malignant tumorigenesis [1]. In addition, there is increasing evidence that the tissue microenvironment is an important determinant of whether and how malignancies develop [2,3]. Normal tissue environ- ments tend to suppress malignant phenotypes, whereas abnormal tissue environments such at those caused by inﬂammation can promote cancer progression. Cancer development is restrained by a variety of tumor suppressor genes. Some of these genes permanently arrest the growth of cells at risk for neoplastic transformation, a process termed cellular senescence [4–6]. Two tumor suppressor pathways, controlled by the p53 and p16INK4a/pRB proteins, regulate senescence responses. Both pathways integrate multiple aspects of cellular physiology and direct cell fate towards survival, death, proliferation, or growth arrest, depending on the context [7,8]. Several lines of evidence indicate that cellular senescence is a potent tumor-suppressive mechanism [4,9,10]. Many poten- tially oncogenic stimuli (e.g., dysfunctional telomeres, DNA PLoS Biology | www.plosbiology.org damage, and certain oncogenes) induce senescence [6,11]. Moreover, mutations that dampen the p53 or p16INK4a/pRB pathways confer resistance to senescence and greatly increase cancer risk [12,13]. Most cancers harbor mutations in one or both of these pathways [14,15]. Lastly, in mice and humans, a senescence response to strong mitogenic signals, such as those delivered by certain oncogenes, prevents premalignant lesions from progressing to malignant cancers [16–19]. Academic Editor: Julian Downward, Cancer Research UK, United Kingdom Received June 27, 2008; Accepted October 22, 2008; Published December 2, 2008 Copyright: O 2008 Coppe et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abbreviations: CM, conditioned medium; DDR, DNA damage response; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; EMT, epithelial–mesenchymal transition; GSE, genetic suppressor element; IL, interleukin; MIT, mitoxantrone; PRE, presenescent; PrEC, normal human prostate epithelial cell; REP, replicative exhaustion; SASP, senescence-associated secretory phenotype; SEN, senescent; shRNA, short hairpin RNA; XRA, X-irradiation * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jcampisi@lbl.gov [ These authors contributed equally to this work. ¤ Current address: Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California, United States of America December 2008 | Volume 6 | Issue 12 | e301

Rb-mediated heterochromatin formation and silencing of E2F target genes during cellular senescence.

Almost half a century after the first reports describing the limited replicative potential of primary cells in culture, there is now overwhelming evidence for the existence of “cellular senescence” in vivo. It is being recognized as a critical feature of mammalian cells to suppress tumorigenesis, acting alongside cell death programs. Here, we review the various features of cellular senescence and discuss their contribution to tumor suppression. Additionally, we highlight the power and limitations of the biomarkers currently used to identify senescent cells in vitro and in vivo.

/pdf/the-essence-of-senescence-43htknrd2h.pdf

The essence of senescence

In the last decade, basic cancer research has produced remarkable advances in our understanding of cancer biology and cancer genetics. Among the most important of these advances is the realization that apoptosis and the genes that control it have a profound effect on the malignant phenotype. For example, it is now clear that some oncogenic mutations disrupt apoptosis, leading to tumor initiation, progression or metastasis. Conversely, compelling evidence indicates that other oncogenic changes promote apoptosis, thereby producing selective pressure to override apoptosis during multistage carcinogenesis. Finally, it is now well documented that most cytotoxic anticancer agents induce apoptosis, raising the intriguing possibility that defects in apoptotic programs contribute to treatment failure. Because the same mutations that suppress apoptosis during tumor development also reduce treatment sensitivity, apoptosis provides a conceptual framework to link cancer genetics with cancer therapy. An intense research effort is uncovering the underlying mechanisms of apoptosis such that, in the next decade, one envisions that this information will produce new strategies to exploit apoptosis for therapeutic benefit.

Apoptosis in cancer

Exposure of human tumor cell lines to different chemotherapeutic drugs, ionizing radiation, and differentiating agents induced morphological, enzymatic, and ploidy changes resembling replicative senescence of normal cells. Moderate doses of doxorubicin induced this senescence-like phenotype (SLP) in 11 of 14 tested cell lines derived from different types of human solid tumors, including all of the lines with wild-type p53 and half of p53-mutated cell lines. SLP induction seemed to be independent from mitotic cell death, the other major effect of drug treatment. Among cells that survived drug exposure, SLP markers distinguished those cells that became terminally growth-arrested within a small number of cell divisions from the cells that recovered and resumed proliferation. SLP induction in breast carcinoma cells treated with retinoids in vitro or in vivo was found to correlate with permanent growth inhibition under the conditions of minimal cytotoxicity, suggesting that this response may be particularly important for the antiproliferative effect of differentiating agents. The senescence-like program of terminal proliferation arrest may provide an important determinant of treatment outcome and a target for augmentation in cancer therapy.

https://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/59/15/3761.full.pdf

A senescence-like phenotype distinguishes tumor cells that undergo terminal proliferation arrest after exposure to anticancer agents

Exposure of human tumor cell lines to moderate doses of anticancer agents induces terminal proliferation arrest accompanied by morphologic and enzymatic changes that resemble senescence of normal cells. We have investigated the role of p53 and p21waf1/cip1 in the induction of this response in drug-treated tumor cells. Doxorubicin treatment induced the senescence-like phenotype (SLP) and its associated terminal growth arrest in wild-type HCT116 colon carcinoma cells; this response was strongly decreased but not abolished in HCT116 lines with homozygous knockout of p53 or p21. Transduction of HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells with a genetic inhibitor of p53 also decreased the induction of SLP and increased drug-induced mitotic cell death. To determine if drug-stimulated p21 expression was responsible for senescence-like growth arrest, we have expressed different levels of p21 from an inducible promoter. While high-level overexpression of p21 was sufficient to induce SLP in HT1080 cells, the levels of p21 expressed in doxorubicin-treated cells could account for only a fraction of doxorubicin-induced SLP. Our results indicate that p53 and p21 act as positive regulators of senescence-like terminal proliferation arrest, but their function is neither sufficient nor absolutely required for this treatment response in tumor cells.

Role of p53 and p21waf1/cip1 in senescence-like terminal proliferation arrest induced in human tumor cells by chemotherapeutic drugs.

Induction of p21 (WAF1/CIP1/SDI1), a physiological mediator of cell cycle arrest, inhibits multiple genes involved in cell division. We have investigated the determinants of p21- mediated inhibition of two of these genes, polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) and topoisomerase IIalpha (TOPO IIalpha) p21 expression from an inducible promoter in human HT1080 cells rapidly decreases cellular levels of PLK1 and TOPO IIalpha promoters in transient and stable transfection assays. Promoter mutagenesis studies show that inhibition of the PLK1 promoter by p21 is mediated in part by tandem sequences CDE (cell cycle-dependent element) and CHR (cell cycle genes homology region). p21 response of the TOPO IIalpha promoter inhibition and the effects of promoter mutations differ under the conditions of growth arrest produced by p21 induction or by mimosine, a cell cycle inhibitor that increases p21 RNA but not protein expression in HT1080 cells. These results indicate that inhibition of cell division-associated genes by p21 is mediated by different but overlapping mechanisms, which are not a general con-sequence of cell cycle arrest.

Identification of promoter elements responsible for transcriptional inhibition of polo-like kinase 1 and topoisomerase IIalpha genes by p21(WAF1/CIP1/SDI1).

Background and purpose: Nitroglycerin tolerance is a common phenomenon in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) is the enzyme that metabolizes nitroglycerin to its active form nitric oxide (NO). Previous studies showed altered nitroglycerin in subjects with ALDH2 mutation, but the functional impact on endothelial cells is not fully understood. Methods: In the first step of in vitro experiments, we examined functional properties of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived CD144+ endothelial cells (iPSC-ECs) that expressed wildtype (WT) vs ALDH2+/− variant. In the second step of human studies, diameter of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery was determined using angiography in 151 adult volunteers (111 with WT ALDH2, 32 with ALDH2+/− and 8 with ALDH2−/− genotype) prior to as well as after intracoronary injection of 200-μg nitroglycerin. Results: Briefly, the ALDH2+/− iPSC-ECs demonstrated impaired low-density lipoprotein (LDL) uptake, proliferation, migration, tube formation, oxidative stress resistance, and viability. In comparison to the WT control, the ALDH2+/− iPSC-ECs had elevated NO production under baseline conditions, but exhibited a delayed NO release after nitroglycerin treatment. Exposure to 10-μg/mL nitroglycerin for 2 h increased NO production in WT iPSC-ECs but 4-h exposure was required to stimulate NO production in the ALDH2+/− iPSC-ECs. In comparison to the WT control, the subjects carrying the ALDH2+/− variants had seemingly larger LAD coronary artery diameter (3.5 and 3.8 mm vs 3.4 mm in the WT control), but attenuated vasodilatory response to nitroglycerin (ALDH2MUT group vs the WT control, 7.1 ± 0.6% vs 10.1 ± 0.8%, P = 0.024). Conclusion: These findings indicated elevated NO production by endothelia cells under basal conditions but attenuated response to nitroglycerin upon ALDH2 mutation. 

ALDH2 mutation results in excessive basal nitric oxide production and a delayed response to nitroglycerin

<h3>Introduction/Background</h3> Recent studies have shown that the research of tumor cells alone cannot explain many phenomena in tumors, so the concept of tumor microenvironment has attracted more and more attention in tumor research. Studies have found that tumor cells need to interact with other cells, especially cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) to promote tumor progression. COL5A2 belongs to collagen family and is an important part of extracellular matrix in tumor microenvironment. Therefore, taking COL5A2 as the core to clarify the specific mechanism of the interaction between ovarian cancer cells and CAFs in the ovarian tumor microenvironment can provide a theoretical basis for the development of new treatment strategies for ovarian cancer. <h3>Methodology</h3> We analyzed the expression of COL5A2 in 65 cases of ovarian cancer tissue specimens and explored the mechanism of altered COL5A2 expression in ovarian tumor microenvironment. Then we explored the underlying mechanisms of the effect of COL5A2 on cell proliferation, migration and invasion of ovarian cancer in vitro and in vivo. <h3>Results</h3> (1) Compared with normal ovarian tissues, COL5A2 is highly expressed in ovarian cancer tissues, and when COL5A2 is highly expressed, the prognosis of ovarian cancer is worse.(2) COL5A2 mainly comes from CAFs.(3) The exosomes carrying ITGB1 secreted by ovarian cancer cells can activate the function of CAFs and promote the expression and secretion of COL5A2.(4) COL5A2 can activate FAK/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway of ovarian cancer cells by combining with ITGAV on the surface of ovarian cancer cells, thus promoting the proliferation, migration and invasion of ovarian cancer. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Ovarian cancer cells activate CAFs and promote their expression and secretion of COL5A2 by secreting exosomes carrying ITGB1. COL5A2, which is widely expressed and secreted, can act as the signal molecule feedback on ovarian cancer cells to promote the proliferation, migration and invasion of ovarian cancer. 

/pdf/2022-ra-830-esgo-expression-of-col5a2-in-ovarian-tumor-2zkd7wmk.pdf

Hongming Zhu

Papers

A senescence-like phenotype distinguishes tumor cells that undergo terminal proliferation arrest after exposure to anticancer agents

Role of p53 and p21waf1/cip1 in senescence-like terminal proliferation arrest induced in human tumor cells by chemotherapeutic drugs.

Identification of promoter elements responsible for transcriptional inhibition of polo-like kinase 1 and topoisomerase IIalpha genes by p21(WAF1/CIP1/SDI1).

ALDH2 mutation results in excessive basal nitric oxide production and a delayed response to nitroglycerin

2022-RA-830-ESGO Expression of COL5A2 in ovarian tumor microenvironment and its mechanism of promoting ovarian cancer