scispace - formally typeset
I

Ian Blunt

Researcher at Nuffield Trust

Publications -  18
Citations -  764

Ian Blunt is an academic researcher from Nuffield Trust. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health care & Integrated care. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 18 publications receiving 713 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Development of a predictive model to identify inpatients at risk of re-admission within 30 days of discharge (PARR-30)

TL;DR: Though the models had a low sensitivity, it is shown how to identify subgroups of patients that contain a high proportion of patients who will be re-admitted to NHS hospitals within 30 days.
Journal ArticleDOI

Is secondary preventive care improving? Observational study of 10-year trends in emergency admissions for conditions amenable to ambulatory care

TL;DR: Investigation of trends in emergency admissions for patients with clinical conditions classed as ‘ambulatory care sensitive’ (ACS) in England suggests that efforts to improve the preventive management of certain clinical conditions have failed to reduce the demand for emergency care.
Journal ArticleDOI

Statistical methods for healthcare regulation: rating, screening and surveillance

TL;DR: In this paper, a common approach to data standardization based on (possibly overdispersed) Z-scores is proposed, although specific tools are used for assessing performance against a target, combining indicators when screening for inspection, and continuous monitoring using risk-adjusted sequential testing procedures.
Journal ArticleDOI

Classifying emergency 30-day readmissions in England using routine hospital data 2004–2010: what is the scope for reduction?

TL;DR: An exploratory categorisation based on likely causes of readmission found a large minority of emergency readmissions fell into groups potentially amenable to immediate reduction, suggesting that a hospital's ability to reduce emergency readmission is less clear.
Journal ArticleDOI

Integrated care pilot in north west London: a mixed methods evaluation

TL;DR: The pilot had successfully engaged provider organisations, created a shared strategic vision and established governance structures, however, the engagement of clinicians was variable and there was no evidence to date of significant reductions in emergency admissions.