Cluster analysis is a primary method for database mining. It is either used as a stand-alone tool to get insight into the distribution of a data set, e.g. to focus further analysis and data processing, or as a preprocessing step for other algorithms operating on the detected clusters. Almost all of the well-known clustering algorithms require input parameters which are hard to determine but have a significant influence on the clustering result. Furthermore, for many real-data sets there does not even exist a global parameter setting for which the result of the clustering algorithm describes the intrinsic clustering structure accurately. We introduce a new algorithm for the purpose of cluster analysis which does not produce a clustering of a data set explicitly; but instead creates an augmented ordering of the database representing its density-based clustering structure. This cluster-ordering contains information which is equivalent to the density-based clusterings corresponding to a broad range of parameter settings. It is a versatile basis for both automatic and interactive cluster analysis. We show how to automatically and efficiently extract not only 'traditional' clustering information (e.g. representative points, arbitrary shaped clusters), but also the intrinsic clustering structure. For medium sized data sets, the cluster-ordering can be represented graphically and for very large data sets, we introduce an appropriate visualization technique. Both are suitable for interactive exploration of the intrinsic clustering structure offering additional insights into the distribution and correlation of the data.

OPTICS: ordering points to identify the clustering structure

This paper addresses the problem of the classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images by support vector machines (SVMs) First, we propose a theoretical discussion and experimental analysis aimed at understanding and assessing the potentialities of SVM classifiers in hyperdimensional feature spaces Then, we assess the effectiveness of SVMs with respect to conventional feature-reduction-based approaches and their performances in hypersubspaces of various dimensionalities To sustain such an analysis, the performances of SVMs are compared with those of two other nonparametric classifiers (ie, radial basis function neural networks and the K-nearest neighbor classifier) Finally, we study the potentially critical issue of applying binary SVMs to multiclass problems in hyperspectral data In particular, four different multiclass strategies are analyzed and compared: the one-against-all, the one-against-one, and two hierarchical tree-based strategies Different performance indicators have been used to support our experimental studies in a detailed and accurate way, ie, the classification accuracy, the computational time, the stability to parameter setting, and the complexity of the multiclass architecture The results obtained on a real Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectroradiometer hyperspectral dataset allow to conclude that, whatever the multiclass strategy adopted, SVMs are a valid and effective alternative to conventional pattern recognition approaches (feature-reduction procedures combined with a classification method) for the classification of hyperspectral remote sensing data

/pdf/classification-of-hyperspectral-remote-sensing-images-with-51xjutm0y6.pdf

Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines

Classification and Change Detection Using Landsat TM Data: When and How to Correct Atmospheric Effects?

https://rslab.disi.unitn.it/papers/R63-RSE-Plaza.pdf

Recent Advances in Techniques for Hyperspectral Image Processing

Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data

http://www.gbv.de/dms/ilmenau/toc/024184004richa.PDF

J. A. Richards

Papers

Remote sensing digital image analysis