The Montreal Definition and Classification of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Global Evidence-Based Consensus

A systematic review of the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) has been performed, applying strict criteria for quality of studies and the disease definition used. The prevalence and incidence of GORD was estimated from 15 studies which defined GORD as at least weekly heartburn and/or acid regurgitation and met criteria concerning sample size, response rate, and recall period. Data on factors associated with GORD were also evaluated.

An approximate prevalence of 10–20% was identified for GORD, defined by at least weekly heartburn and/or acid regurgitation in the Western world while in Asia this was lower, at less than 5%. The incidence in the Western world was approximately 5 per 1000 person years. A number of potential risk factors (for example, an immediate family history and obesity) and comorbidities (for example, respiratory diseases and chest pain) associated with GORD were identified.

Data reported in this systematic review can be interpreted with confidence as reflecting the epidemiology of “true” GORD. The disease is more common in the Western world than in Asia, and the low rate of incidence relative to prevalence reflects its chronicity. The small number of studies eligible for inclusion in this review highlights the need for global consensus on a symptom based definition of GORD.

The study of the epidemiology of GORD is restricted by the lack of consensus over the basic definition of the disease. To review the global epidemiology of GORD is currently problematic as there is no internationally applied definition, although the need for this has been recognised.1 Gastro-oesophageal reflux manifests as a continuum of symptom frequency and/or severity in the general population. Occasional symptoms are experienced by a large proportion of the population but GORD results from frequent or severe symptoms which are sufficient to impair the individual’s health related quality of life …

https://gut.bmj.com/content/gutjnl/54/5/710.full.pdf

Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review

Objective: T o de v elop a North American Society for Pediatric Ga str oen te rol og y , He pat olo gy , and Nut ri tio n (N ASP GH AN) and Eu rop ea n Soc ie ty fo r Pe di atr ic Gas tr oen te ro log y , Hep at ol og y , and Nut rit io n (ES PGH AN ) int er nat io nal con se ns us on th e di agn os is an d ma nag em ent of gas tr oes op hag eal refl ux and gas tr oes op hag eal re flu x di sea se in th e ped ia tr ic po pu la tio n. Methods: An international panel of 9 pediatric gastroenterologists and 2 epidemiologists were selected by both societies, which de v eloped these guidelines based on the Delphi principle. Statements were based on systematic literature searches using the best-av ailable e vidence from PubMed, Cumulati ve Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and bibliographies. The committee con v ened in face-to-face meetings 3 times. Consensus was achie v ed for all recommendations through nominal group technique, a structured, quantitati v e method. Articles were e v aluated using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Le vels of Evidence. Using the Oxford Grades of Recommendation, the quality of e vidence of each of the recommendations made by the committee was determined and is summarized in appendices. Results: More than 600 articles were re vie wed for this work. The document provides e vidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux and gastroesophageal reflux disease in the pediatric population. Conclusions: Th is do cum ent is int end ed to be us ed in dai ly pra cti ce fo r th e de v el op me nt of fut ure cli ni cal pra ct ic e gu ide lin es and as a bas is for cli ni cal tr ia ls . JP GN 49 :49 8 – 54 7, 20 09 . Ke y Wo rd s: Cli nic al pra ct ic e gu id el ine s — Di agn os tic te sts — Ga str oes op hag ea l refl ux (GE R) — Ga str oes op hag ea l refl ux di sea se (GE RD ) — The rap eut ic mod al iti es. # 20 09 by Eu rop ea n Soc ie ty fo r Pe di atr ic Gas tr oen te ro log y , Hep at ol og y , and Nut rit io n and No rt h Am er ica n So ci ety for Pe dia tri c Ga str oen te rol og y , Hep at ol og y , an d Nu tr iti on

/pdf/pediatric-gastroesophageal-reflux-clinical-practice-359og269ui.pdf

Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Clinical Practice Guidelines: Joint Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN)

https://gut.bmj.com/content/gutjnl/45/suppl_2/II31.full.pdf

Functional esophageal disorders.

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER), defined as passage of gastric contents into the esophagus, and GER disease (GERD), defined as symptoms or complications of GER, are common pediatric problems encountered by both primary and specialty medical providers. Clinical manifestations of GERD in children include vomiting, poor weight gain, dysphagia, abdominal or substernal pain, esophagitis and respiratory disorders. The GER Guideline Committee of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition has formulated a clinical practice guideline for the management of pediatric GER. The GER Guideline Committee, consisting of a primary care pediatrician, two clinical epidemiologists (who also practice primary care pediatrics) and five pediatric gastroenterologists, based its recommendations on an integration of a comprehensive and systematic review of the medical literature combined with expert opinion. Consensus was achieved through Nominal Group Technique, a structured quantitative method. The Committee examined the value of diagnostic tests and treatment modalities commonly used for the management of GERD, and how those interventions can be applied to clinical situations in the infant and older child. The guideline provides recommendations for management by the primary care provider, including evaluation, initial treatment, follow-up management and indications for consultation by a specialist. The guideline also provides recommendations for management by the pediatric gastroenterologist. This document represents the official recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition on the evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in infants and children. The American Academy of Pediatrics has also endorsed these recommendations. The recommendations are summarized in a synopsis within the article. This review and recommendations are a general guideline and are not intended as a substitute for clinical judgment or as a protocol for the management of all patients with this problem.

Guidelines for evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in infants and children: recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.

This report summarises conclusions from an evidence-based workshop which evaluated major clinical strategies for the management of the full spectrum of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, with an emphasis on medical management.

The disease was defined by the presence of oesophageal mucosal breaks or by the occurrence of reflux induced symptoms severe enough to impair quality of life. Endoscopy negative patients were recognised as the most common subgroup; most of these patients can be diagnosed by a well structured symptom analysis. There is a consistent hierarchy of effectiveness of available initial and long term therapies that applies for all patient subgroups. Lifestyle measures were judged to be of such low efficacy that they were rejected as a primary therapy for all patient subgroups. Proton pump inhibitor therapy was considered the initial medical treatment of choice because of its clearly superior efficacy which results in the most prompt achievement of desirable outcomes at the lowest overall medical cost. It was acknowledged that most of patients require long term management and that any maintenance therapy should be chosen by step down to the regimen that is still effective, but least costly. Endoscopic monitoring of routine long term therapy was considered inappropriate, on the basis that control of symptoms is an acceptably reliable indicator of healing in patients with oesophagitis.

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery was recognised as a significant therapeutic advance, the results of which, however, depend substantially on the experience of the surgeon. There are currently no published direct comparisons of cost and efficacy outcomes of optimal medical and surgical therapies for reflux disease. To a significant degree, the choice between medical and surgical therapy should depend on informed patient preference.

Substantial advances have occurred recently in the understanding and treatment of reflux disease. By contrast, there has been relatively little research into the best …

https://gut.bmj.com/content/gutjnl/44/suppl_2/S1.full.pdf

J. C. Reynolds

Papers

An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management — the Genval Workshop Report