A method is presented for passive imaging of cavitational acoustic emissions using an ultrasound array, with potential application in real-time monitoring of ultrasound ablation. To create such images, microbubble emissions were passively sensed by an imaging array and dynamically focused at multiple depths. In this paper, an analytic expression for a passive image is obtained by solving the Rayleigh–Sommerfield integral, under the Fresnel approximation, and passive images were simulated. A 192-element array was used to create passive images, in real time, from 520-kHz ultrasound scattered by a 1-mm steel wire. Azimuthal positions of this target were accurately estimated from the passive images. Next, stable and inertial cavitation was passively imaged in saline solution sonicated at 520 kHz. Bubble clusters formed in the saline samples were consistently located on both passive images and B-scans. Passive images were also created using broadband emissions from bovine liver sonicated at 2.2 MHz. Agreement was found between the images and source beam shape, indicating an ability to map therapeutic ultrasound beams in situ. The relation between these broadband emissions, sonication amplitude, and exposure conditions are discussed.

Passive cavitation imaging with ultrasound arrays

Acoustic emissions associated with cavitation and other bubble activity have previously been observed during ultrasound (US) ablation experiments. Because detectable bubble activity may be related to temperature, tissue state and sonication characteristics, these acoustic emissions are potentially useful for monitoring and control of US ablation. To investigate these relationships, US ablation experiments were performed with simultaneous measurements of acoustic emissions, tissue echogenicity and tissue temperature on fresh bovine liver. Ex vivo tissue was exposed to 0.9-3.3-s bursts of unfocused, continuous-wave, 3.10-MHz US from a miniaturized 32-element array, which performed B-scan imaging with the same piezoelectric elements during brief quiescent periods. Exposures used pressure amplitudes of 0.8-1.4 MPa for exposure times of 6-20 min, sufficient to achieve significant thermal coagulation in all cases. Acoustic emissions received by a 1-MHz, unfocused passive cavitation detector, beamformed A-line signals acquired by the array, and tissue temperature detected by a needle thermocouple were sampled 0.3-1.1 times per second. Tissue echogenicity was quantified by the backscattered echo energy from a fixed region-of-interest within the treated zone. Acoustic emission levels were quantified from the spectra of signals measured by the passive cavitation detector, including subharmonic signal components at 1.55 MHz, broadband signal components within the band 0.3-1.1 MHz and low-frequency components within the band 10-30 kHz. Tissue ablation rates, defined as the thermally ablated volumes per unit time, were assessed by quantitative analysis of digitally imaged, macroscopic tissue sections. Correlation analysis was performed among the averaged and time-dependent acoustic emissions in each band considered, B-mode tissue echogenicity, tissue temperature and ablation rate. Ablation rate correlated significantly with broadband and low-frequency emissions, but was uncorrelated with subharmonic emissions. Subharmonic emissions were found to depend strongly on temperature in a nonlinear manner, with significant emissions occurring within different temperature ranges for each sonication amplitude. These results suggest potential roles for passive detection of acoustic emissions in guidance and control of bulk US ablation treatments.

/pdf/acoustic-emissions-during-3-1-mhz-ultrasound-bulk-ablation-5cslwmktry.pdf

Acoustic emissions during 3.1 MHz ultrasound bulk ablation in vitro.

Characteristics and mechanisms of acoustic emission from solids under applied stress

The use of acoustic emission methods as aids to the structural integrity assessment of nuclear power plants

General review of developments in acoustic emission methods

The acoustic noise spectra from 0 to 700 kHz of a boiling water reactor (BWR) have been normalized and compared with the available noise data of a pressurized water reactor (PWR). At frequencies near 500 kHz, which is the interesting frequency range for acoustic emission technology, the hydraulic turbulent and cavitation noises of the PWR were about 0 dB for the selected normalization and the noises of the BWR varied from 0 to 15 dB for the various locations that were monitored. Since the intensity levels of acoustic emission signals are on the order of 0 to 20 dB, the PWR background noise should not completely mask them; however, the BWR noise would obliterate some weak acoustic signals in some locations but allow them to be observed in other locations.

J. E. Knight

Papers

Background noise for acoustic emission in a boiling water and a pressurized water nuclear‐power reactor