scispace - formally typeset
J

Jada Bussey-Jones

Researcher at Emory University

Publications -  30
Citations -  1020

Jada Bussey-Jones is an academic researcher from Emory University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health equity & Health care. The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 27 publications receiving 918 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Prescription for Cultural Competence in Medical Education

TL;DR: In this article, the authors recommend a number of elements to strengthen cultural competency education in medical schools, intended to promote an active and integrated approach to multicultural issues throughout medical school training.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recommendations for teaching about racial and ethnic disparities in health and health care.

TL;DR: This report presents the work of the Society of General Internal Medicine Health Disparities Task Force to develop guidelines for medical education on disparities in health and health care, and provides learning objectives, suggested content, methods for teaching, and a set of current resources.
Journal ArticleDOI

Repaving the road to academic success: the IMeRGE approach to peer mentoring.

TL;DR: The authors describe the formation and organization of the Internal Medicine Research Group at Emory (IMeRGE), an innovative peer mentoring group within the Division of General Medicine at Emories University, and present the paradigm of IMeRGE as a template for alternative forms of academic mentorship.
Journal ArticleDOI

The role of race and trust in tissue/blood donation for genetic research

TL;DR: Factors associated with provision of tissue samples reflected many previously identified demographic factors (race and trust) and interventions to improve and demonstrate the trustworthiness of the research team and recruitment of subjects with a record of sample donation might enhance future study participation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Great expectations: views of genetic research participants regarding current and future genetic studies.

TL;DR: Despite very positive attitudes of these participants toward genetic research, there is significant variation based on participant characteristics, which should encourage and caution researchers attempting to recruit prior participants into genetic studies.