scispace - formally typeset
J

James C. French

Researcher at University of Virginia

Publications -  82
Citations -  2194

James C. French is an academic researcher from University of Virginia. The author has contributed to research in topics: Image retrieval & Visual Word. The author has an hindex of 26, co-authored 82 publications receiving 2175 citations.

Papers
More filters

Legion: The Next Logical Step Toward a Nationwide Virtual Computer

TL;DR: The coming of giga-bit networks makes possible the realization of a single nationwide virtual computer comprised of a variety of geographically distributed high-performance machines and workstations, and the approach to constructing and exploiting such “metasystems” is described.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Clustering large datasets in arbitrary metric spaces

TL;DR: Two scalable algorithms designed for clustering very large datasets in distance spaces are presented, one of which is, to the authors' knowledge, the first scalable clustering algorithm for data in a distance space and the second improves upon BUBBLE by reducing the number of calls to the distance function, which may be computationally very expensive.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Comparing the performance of database selection algorithms

TL;DR: It is found that CORI is a uniformly better estimator of relevance-based ranks than gGlOSS for the test environment used in this study, and part of the advantage of the CORI algorithm can be explained by a strong correlation between gGloss and a size-based baseline (SBR).
Proceedings ArticleDOI

The impact of database selection on distributed searching

TL;DR: It is found that good database selection can result in better retrieval effectiveness than can be achieved in a centralized database, and that the performance generally increases as more sites are selected.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Evaluating database selection techniques: a testbed and experiment

TL;DR: The initial results confirm that the gGZOSS estimators are excellent predictors of the Ideal(Z) ranks but that the Ideal (l) ranks do not estimate relevance-based ranks well and the degree to which several gGlOSS estimate functions approximate these baselines is examined.