scispace - formally typeset
J

James Gockowski

Publications -  5
Citations -  55

James Gockowski is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Tobit model & Bargaining power. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 5 publications receiving 50 citations.

Papers
More filters
Posted Content

Investing in agrochemicals in the cocoa sector of Côte d’Ivoire: hypotheses, evidence and policy implications

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present empirical evidence to show how socioeconomic factors affect the adoption of and investment in agrochemicals in the cocoa sector of Cote d'Ivoire.
Posted ContentDOI

Investing in agrochemicals in the cocoa sector of Côte d’Ivoire: hypotheses, evidence and policy implications

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present empirical evidence to show how socioeconomic factors affect the adoption of and investment in agrochemicals in the cocoa sector of Cote d'Ivoire.
Posted ContentDOI

The Role of Credit Access in Improving Cocoa Production in West African Countries

TL;DR: In this paper, the role of access to credit on cocoa production, in West African cocoa production countries under conditions of agricultural policy liberalization, was examined, and the authors concluded that there is a need of promoted credit institutions specialized in saving mobilization and credit supply to farmers in general and cocoa farmers specifically.
Posted ContentDOI

What determines the price received by cocoa farmers in Cameroon? An empirical analysis based on bargaining theory

TL;DR: In this article, the authors used data from 1,854 cocoa transactions between traders and producers in Cameroon during the 2005/2006 season, and showed that when the bargaining situation is least favorable to the producers (because prices are non-negotiable due to interlinked credit and there is information asymmetry) traders seize the entire surplus generated by the trade.

What determines the price received by farmers? The case of cocoa in Cameroon

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined two different solutions: increasing the bargaining power of individual producers and collective marketing through producer organizations (POs), and showed that selling produce via the POs generally results in a price increase of 9% caused by improvement in a reduction in transaction costs and improved bargaining power.